THIS isn't the Dammmed law, this is a photo of a Facebook post that contains fabricated, thus unreferenced, legal sounding material.

 Your "Dammmed law" posting claims 50 states exist in 1866, you don't see an issue with that?

 Want me to break down the inaccuracies further, read the actual case referenced and tell you what it really says, or do you want to spend 5 minutes looking this up yourself?  I'm not trying to be a jerk, I am asking if you want to give this a try.

 Here's a hint: "Section 98" doesn't even exist.


 To make it easier I'll even pull up the case here, which if you take the time to only read the first line it will say "It is unconstitutional to try civilians by military tribunals unless there is no civilian court available" since that is what the case is actually about:

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/71/2/



 THIS is nothing more than people spreading lies because they like what the posting says and won't look it up themselves.  

 When this is done against Trump it's "fake news" and unacceptable but if it's done by screenshotting social media posts is it only the fault of the person who originally posted it?

Of course Elected Officials within The Federal Government have the authority to enact and enforce regulations based upon circumstances such as we find ourselves in.

Of course citizens have the right to unelected those officials.

If the citizenry feels Elected Representatives are overstepping, over reacting and perhaps becoming a little too comfortable with power, vote them out.

But insisting citizens automatically ignore and purposely counteract instructions is not the right path. For example, these newly liberated patriots    downstream from a soon to collapse darn would find out too late that the system depends on a certain level of trust between the Representatives and the Citizens. Ignoring demands to flee because “It’s my Constitutional right not too” would be foolish, unless they happen to be particularly good swimmers.

Having said all of that,  the problem we find today is that many of our elected officials have done exactly that, they’ve gotten very comfortable with the feeling of excessive power. The governor in my neighboring state of Illinois is a perfect example. A millionaire, he sent his wife to Florida to live in another home of theirs. Florida is mostly open so she shops and dines as she chooses while he enforces draconian measures in rural areas across southern Illinois  who’ve had little or no impact from Covid. that’s a problem and he should face consequences in both the media and at the polls. Of course we have suspicions neither will happen because of the un-level playing field in those two arenas. But that’s a different story.

"Of course Elected Officials within The Federal Government have the authority to enact and enforce regulations based upon circumstances such as we find ourselves in."

 Unless someone makes up a Supreme Court ruling that never happened and says that the completely made-up ruling is proof that the actions of Governors are unconstitutional.

Serowbot wrote on 05/28/20 at 07:12:29:

50 states..  
Is this a Trump quote?...  

Don't think so.
However:
Obama, DID SAY, he's going to campaign in 57 states.

         
         
       
       
     
     
   
   
 

MnSpring wrote on 05/28/20 at 07:38:50:

Do you want to weigh that against Trump's oratory record?....