Eegore wrote on 04/06/20 at 10:14:59:


Exact figures? No.. NO WAY TO KNOW, however, Weve seen ships with known numbers of people, known ages, known preexisting conditions and the exact number of infected, symptomatic and asymptomatic.
Pretending those numbers are without value in coming up with approximate ratios of asymptomatic people walking around, unwittingly spreading it, is ludicrous. And USING that approximate to develop a better feel for the mortality rate is reasonable.
Why arent ALL the people on a ship affected? Are some simply not exposed? Or maybe some are immune? Maybe some blood tests would show that some of the people who didnt get sick were immune because of some earlier exposure to something that created antibodies that protect against this thing, too.

"Pretending those numbers are without value in coming up with approximate ratios of asymptomatic people walking around, unwittingly spreading it, is ludicrous."

 I'm not saying it is without value.  I presented my material here, right at 336 pages and they all included the ship data.  Did you even bother to run the numbers?

 What I am saying is that the numbers being used to support each other's arguments are different, and utilized differently.  It's like comparing fuel usage on a lawnmower per square foot and also per blade of grass cut.  Saying it cuts millions of blades of grass per tank of gas sounds way better than saying it cuts 500 square feet per tank.

 In this example there is no way to know how many blades were cut unless you spend tons of time counting grass, and at that there will still be considerable issue since not all blades are sucked into the bag so the count will never be accurate.  

 So here we have someone saying "Why is the gas mileage on this mower so inefficient when compared to that Italian one?" and someone else saying "Why isn't anyone counting the blades of grass?  This thing performs great, it cuts millions of blades per tank."

 Different math for the same subject.

Eegore wrote on 04/06/20 at 12:43:47:




Yup, certain Libtard areas.
Really, you wanna social distance people in NYC and Skid Row - easy - transport them into the middle of Montana. Its only about 20-30 million people, just beam them off one at a time, drop em 10-20 feet from each other, let them know to stay that far from the next person. Tell them a weeks worth of rations will be available at drop off and will be refilled once the week is over and to not go near the next person.

Should barely cost $300 Million or so and well, the beaming technology should be invented. Yea there's that hurdle.

Cool.
Srinath.

Eegore wrote on 04/06/20 at 12:38:51:




Yes you said it - Libtard pump and dump - Like I posted in reply #3 to this retarded question.

I have posted about this before - 77% are in democrap areas.

Democraps are filthy pigs ?
Democraps live in 3rd world like slums ?
Democraps are cry babies ?
Democraps are using this as a excuse to complain about Trump ?
Democraps are looking for freebies and piling onto free chitte ?
Democraps are likely piling onto busses and trains cos its the green thing to do ?
Democraps live in apartments where if you're in "isolation" you're isolating with everyone in the building due to central heating.
Democraps are international travelers cos many of them are foreigners especially Chinese and Indian ?

Take your pick - its likely a bunch of these.

Libtards account for 77% and climbing of deaths and fatalities and soon we'll be at 90% libtard and I'd be shocked if we don't hit 99% libtard. AKA, 100% of libtards want to martyr themselves to removing president and after the failed impeachment, the Virus is the next best hope. Remember they know dead libtards still vote democratic even without vote fraud in the equation. More dead libtards = worse president looks. They know that. So we're in unprecedented territory of libtards falling in front of the train to try to stop it before it gets to election station.

Cool.
Srinath.

srinath wrote on 04/06/20 at 15:36:51:

" ...77% are in democrap areas ..."

Yep sure does look like it.

"... Democraps live in apartments where if you're in "isolation" you're isolating with everyone in the building due to central heating ..."

This I am not sure about.
Many UL DFI FDS Socialists live in Mansions.
Like one I know, owns big chunk of a Island.
One lives in the, 'Arrowhead' area of  Minn and winters in Tuscon AZ.
One owns a Ranch in ND, and winters in Tahoe NM.
And know of one, who STEALS money in DC,
and spends it in a WALLED IN compound, in Calf.

Their is a reason, a whole bunch are called, 'Limousine Liberals' !

 Removing post, placed in wrong thread.

MnSpring wrote on 04/06/20 at 16:09:10:




The politicians getting wealthy should be a freaking crime. How in the world do you get rich off 125K was it a year. Same reason why they spend 3-50 million in 2-6 months campaigning for a 125K a yr job.
The same freaking reason illegals come here and work under the table for below minimum wage - their reward is the US citizen anchor babies and the free education we give them as well as all the other free chitte courtesy bleeding heart charities and fake religion BS where they go hide in a church etc.
The other thing  is, most of the worlds wealthy atleast in the US have made most of their $$$ very very fast. Face book, google, Musk to name just a few. They are all heavily liberal because they need H1's to use as leverage against US citizens to rob both blind.
However the vast majority of citizens who are democrap are completely unaware and are actively voting against their self interest - Remember only citizens are supposed to vote. The illegals and dead people always vote democratic but there are citizens - for example 70% of Indian origin in 16 voted democrap. For Obama it was near 95%. That is actively voting against your self interest. Ofcourse in 2012 Romney was not talking about cutting down on H1's so we had 2 terrible options in that regard.

Cool.
Srinath.