WebsterMark wrote on 12/03/19 at 14:46:48:Can you imagine the effect of putting 40 million women in prison?...
... even 4 million?...
Are you going to put 50 million in prison who refuse to turn over 'assault' weapons?
See, that's really not a valid part of the argument now is it?
Yes...when it only impacts you, and not me....
Again, lets back up to something as basic, yet such a pillar, to what separates us, from so many other forms of governance.....
free speechThe moment you start putting conditions on it, you undermine its foundation......
You can justify it all you want, label this censoring, under the guise of it poses a threat, etc.....
You have to be really honest, to see this as it
IS..... or by default,
res ipsa loquiturHowever.....any assaults upon this freedom, will only strengthen it, in the long run, but yes, many victims will lay ruined, by those trying to capitalize upon it for self promotions/beliefs, but any victory will be fleeting, and consuming, of true peace, because it is not sustainable without force....
If you can choose just one, which do you think will yield better overall results?
1. Trying to prove you are right.
2. Trying to find agreement.
PS: Overall, a pretty good exchange guys, very little name calling, etc.