[quote author=4A59415C594F5F380 link=1558400289/15#25 date=1558624381]WebsterMark wrote on 05/23/19 at 07:22:30:
Back to the original post, kinda of anyway, old Eau is gonna be crapping kangaroo sized bricks when a Trump clone runs Oz. /quote]
Mark......have you researched this much?
I have read stories about just how wrong the polls were, etc.
My question is this: Why does it seem they are always wrong in predicting that a conservative will lose?
Could it be because they "rig" the results of these polls in trying to get the outcome they want?
If that is the case, the media, etc, using their influences to try and sway elections, why is that not tampering/collusion?
Maybe we need another investigation into this possibility, I mean tampering is tampering be it Russia or CNN...yes?
My 3 cents.
"...The polls were wrong. The pundits were wrong. The party insiders were wrong. The bookies were wrong. ... Even Burt the psychic croc was wrong. ..."I believe it was because, the pundits and party insiders, believed,
they could 'fix' a election, better than the US.
Which brings another question.
Who are, 'party insiders', ?
That term was thrown around a lot here in 2015/16.
Yet No One, ever, identified
who the, 'party insiders', were,
Just what they 'said'.