Pretty hard to dialogue with you when you read into it your desires....sorta like how you say Trump, is all about Trump, you guys share that same trait it seems.....

Oh c'mon ray - don't get all sanctimonious.  Go back and look at your posts before you preach to me, ok?  I'm happy that you found your faith, but don't think it now somehow puts you in a place to judge.  Again, look at your past posts.

Most of my posts simply point out facts and hypocrisy.  I'll get snarky when I get snark.

My "yet" was in context of those wanting Trump's scalp did not have that opportunity to use what had not happened......YET.

My "yet" is in the context of the Mueller report - you know, the same one that actually mentions that Congress should decide whether or not to pursue legal action.

Because he was still reacting to the false charges of collusion....which you hung him with already I can't recite, how many times......

They weren't "false".  Did you not read about the IRA?  Did you not read about the trump tower meeting?  Did you not read any of the report?

We'll just see if this goes as well for you as your last prediction of collusion, or even of Hillary winning the election AND......that's a big and, it clarifies my statement.... becomes president.

I made no such predictions.

I'll wait and see...at this rate, he just might get me to vote for him, proving himself worthy of standing up to all the scrutiny of 4 years of trying to get him, as opposed his opposition getting anything done to fix this nation and its problems.

Well good luck with that.  You'll be on the losing side. (his numbers are tanking)

BTW.....if you want to discuss matters, drop off all the unneeded dialogue about your contempt and hate, and name calling of him, etc.....
It does nothing but pollute and waste any chance to discuss things in a adult and civil manner...or not, if that is what you need.

I'm not going to say everyone is proud; however, I will say his ability to communicate to masses is what got him elected.  A lot people can relate to that kind of blue-collar articulation.  

We don't need joe six-pack.  We need a leader.  As I said, he's unfit for office.

But you're going to sit there and tell me that if a dem president had made those statements that you wouldn't have been all over him/her?  Please....  The religious right would crucify a dem for something like that (very appropriate term used today).

But like everything this idiot has done, you give him a pass and label it "blue collar".

So tired of the hypocrisy.


How are you going to make it another 4 more years if/when he gets elected?  So some reason 'Morgellons' comes to mind.

I don't think he will get elected.  If for some reason he does, it'll shake my faith in this country a little more. But rest assured, I'll be OK.


Best regards,

The thing about hypocrisy is for the charge to be valid, the two sides should be perceived to be equal.

The Leftist Party in 2016 was not on equal footing. They had nominated a POS woman who would have been a disaster for this nation. Trump was our only recourse so he gets a wide latitude.

Really?  How much has the budget deficit risen? (hint - 70%)  How has our trade deficit been under trump? (hint - worse than under Obama)

Oh, right - deficits don't matter with republicans in office... I keep forgetting that....

It's like the difference between a cockroach and cute little puppy. One I squash out of existence, the other can pee on my rug and he gets a pass. Can the puppy do something that gets him kicked out? Sure. Like I said, if the Mueller report showed Trump to be a traitor, back to the pound he'd go.

But it didn't. And when I look at the losers the Dems are putting up in 2020, Trump will be President again.

To quote a good friend of mine, the spending and deficits are in spite of Trump, not because of him.

Well, that would be true if he (or his administration) weren't directly responsible for the trade and budget deficits.

Sorry mark - wrong again.  Nice try on spinning it though.

I just gave you the number one defense: the country thought Hillary and the Democrats sucked so much that Trump was preferable. That should tell you just scummy they think of your party.

Hillary was by far the worst democratic candidate - Bernie should have gotten the nod.  But remember, although she lost the electoral vote (by roughly the attendance at a college football bowl game), she got over 3 million more votes overall... so, yeah.  Again, nice try, but it's not the party, it's the candidate. (remember, every single poll shows that this country is more left leaning than right)

Happy Easter.

To quote a good friend of mine, the spending and deficits are in spite of Trump, not because of him.

I just gave you the number one defense: the country thought Hillary and the Democrats sucked so much that Trump was preferable. That should tell you just scummy they think of your party.

Happy Easter.

T And T Garage wrote on 04/19/19 at 07:34:10:

Yeah, this piss poor excuse of a president just keeps denigrating the office:

And, AOC, BS, Omar, Pelosi, LL, EW, ...
(And so MANY more)
just keeps denigrating the office

Below are not my words.
Yet they seem to be very appropriate to a couple of posters here:
" Your decision to downplay past abuse by playing up current abuse suggests you do not care that bad people are in power, only that your bad people are not in power.”