"
not all legally registered people go vote"
There's no way I am willing to agree that my tax dollars should somehow go to a program that creates a way to get a vote out of someone who chooses not to.
there are ways to do it without spending money, make it compulsory to vote, yes, there are some countries where it's illegal NOT to vote... but we don't even have to get that extreme, make it a federal holiday, give tax incentives to companies that make voting easier for their employees, encourage schools to have mock election days, I'd rather have ANY of that than another tax cut for the rich that gives us the trillion dollar deficits. "some are purged from the registration for partisan reasons, some can't get rides, some don't have "proper" ID"
If these can be modified I am for it. I am all for allowing Native Americans without USPS addresses to vote, I am all for digital voting commissions going to people who can't leave the home.
How would this be paid for would be my primary concern as perpetuating a debt cycle will result in more deficiencies later.
did you care about that with the Trump tax cut fiasco? or the wars? (you might have, I don't remember so I am giving you the benefit of the doubt here, I know you don't care, but ,,,)"
denying felons the right to vote for the rest of their lives"
I am only for denying currently incarcerated felons. I do not want my taxes going to creating a way to get a fair voting system implemented within the prison system based on cost alone. The years it would take to decide if they get to vote in the state they are incarcerated in, or born in, or registered in etc. is a lot to go through for people who commit crimes while grandma can't get food or to the voting booth. For that matter I'd rather the money be allocated to an Innocence Project that frees wrongly convicted persons before spending that money keeping them in prison but getting them a vote.
at least that's something"
just which do you consider to be more important in general everyday life, yes, you have both"
As I said before, if the parameter is one OR the other, then I would choose Capitalism first because equality is costly.
again supporting my thesis that conservatives mainly care about money They both exist, but only one is "more important"
To clarify:
Ranking, to me, is the prioritization of two or more subjects that are placed within a descending numerical structure based off of personal opinion. In this case I have two choices, Democracy AND Equality. I will call them C-1 for choice 1 and C-2 for choice 2.
In order to rank them I will categorize them numerically in my personal opinion scale that ranges from 1 being highest and descending in single whole number value to 2 being the lowest.
Given the choice to rank I must choose C-1 OR C-2 to take the number one spot within my numerical ranking structure. Thus I have a choice of C-1 OR C-2 which can also be stated as having a choice between Democracy OR Capitalism to take the number 1 spot. Both exist but only one can be priority.
dear f-ing Christ!!!! it's not that fuc king hard! quit being a prick about it
I don't even know what the hell you said above, but I'll answer for you, you think capitalism is more important because you like MONEY, and are fine with the way things are. I will not be reading any more of your replies, you are giving me a freaking headache, next time I ask you something I'll draw you a picture and explain it binary