HAPPYDAN wrote on 03/06/18 at 08:47:36:Intriguing thought. As technology stands today, we possess the ability to, say, get to Mars. But, and it's a big but, we can't get them back. The concept of faster is not new, much like an F-16 that fires an air to air missile. The F-16 flies at 700mph and fires a missile which also goes 700 mph. Relative speed of the missile becomes 1400 mph. Add several stages and the lack of air resistance in space, and wow. That's how we get there. How do we get back?
OK Dan, thanks for your reply/interest.....
Let me just offer a glimpse of what I am trying to formulate.....
Keeping power/energy, in mind, as the needed element (that) we will need, to overcome, with present day
KNOWN constraints.
For I think we can assume our solar system
IS the result of some type of power source, yes?
It is also a constraining factor, yes?
You just gave a perfect example.
So, lets look at energy a different way, not like a "fuel" tank, no, but go back to perpetual motion..... follow me?
Like a small spark, as Smokey tells us, can destroy (for the sack of argument) a whole forest, right?
One little minuscule source of energy that is pretty useless, "power-wise" in trying to harness it, use it.
I work on jets, and whenever I am installing avionics or other equipment that has "power" as its source, I must drain any residual "energy" it might have captured while handling, it gets really intense as to where, why, and how things capture energy.....
But if not corralled, controlled, it can wipe out whole circuits, a mere static discharge.
So, energy exist, all around us, I think the key to our riddle is to capture it, and store it, to be able to harness it, like a battery, follow me?