Thanks for doing the sums ☺. I was wondering how they stacked up. So now I'm really curious what it's there for.
I did put it back in until I work out what it is. As I said earlier, my testing has been anecdotal, while I was testing other things.
When I first took it out, on the first test ride, I lost all throttle response above 1/4 turn on the throttle. I assumed I hadn't seated the spring properly in the carb cap (fitting it while still in the bike is a bit fiddly). I took the cap off and refitted while really making sure the spring was seated properly - and being very careful with the diaphragm ). The power gain at open throttle was noticeable.
I'm going to pull the carb when I have time to see if it limits the range of the lifter.
The other thing I thought it might do is guide the large spring. But it's interesting that no-one else on here seems to have seen it in the S40/savage before.
If you do the spacer mod it would be interesting to know if there's one in your carb, given that you are also in Australia.
eau de sauvage wrote on 02/06/17 at 15:31:55:The LAMS power to weight ratio is 150kW per 1000kg then you have to add a further 80kg for the rider and 10kg for petrol, so that would put the S40 at 173kg plus 90kg = 263kg
So that's 3.8 times the power of the bike which is 23kW gives the S40 87kW per tonne, which is so far inside the requirement of 150kW/tonne that it does not make sense that it would be their to make it fit under the LAMS scheme.
In fact it still comes in under the LAMS limit without the extra 90kg!