Heard an interesting remark a person shared with me today.
I was sharing how I find Trump off the wall, like he has no verbal discipline....
That he talks without thinking.
This person said he can handle people better that have no filters than those who weigh every word so not to reveal their real self/thought.

If the "truth" is out in open, we can establish a beginning for honest dialogue, at that point.

Not sure if I can agree in total, as I would never tell my wife, yes, that dress does make your butt look big  

But I can see where he has merit.

verslagen1 wrote on 08/15/16 at 14:04:19:


Did they have big butts ?  

"leader of the free world"
................................

Ahem, just the USA.

http://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/daniel-mitchell/us-barely-cracks-top-20-ran...

Although I agree with the 'bull in a china shop'  

Serowbot wrote on 08/15/16 at 14:26:58:



I agree in spirit, as I have raised 4 kids.
You learn quickly how to tell them the truth, lets say, about a school project, but without hurting their feelings or esteem.
Not that I favor Trump to be the one to, using your words, call a spade a spade.....
But something tells me this wordsmithing has the capacity to lead to more confusion, uncertainty, and  possibly greater misunderstandings....

Whatever happened to the adage, the truth will set us free?

Serowbot wrote on 08/15/16 at 16:30:46:


I am not saying he is telling the truth.
What I am saying is he blurts out any, and everything, the opposite end of  the spectrum, from squelching dialogue, with PC doctrine.

To say a man, can't have an opine, and voice it,  on women's "issues" that are contrary to the feminist, without being labeled a sexist, etc, serves no one. Nothing is debated, therefor nothing is learned.
Tell me, how does that enlighten, or educate?

I offer this PC stuff has led to more misunderstandings, labeling, misconceptions, and in general, fostered ignorance.

Again, move away from your dislike of Trump, what I am seeing is a possible contributing factor to why he is even entertained.....

Not because the guy has answers and repairs, HELL NO....

But because he has voiced stuff people were hobbled to say, ask, inquire, about.

Example: I don't understand the need of a man to desire sex with another man.
I am using my OWN personal observation, a truth, for I lack the emotional connection to understand this drive.
I guess its my declaration, stated as a question, that is inviting dialogue.
I am NOT judging, no, but asking and sharing.

What are the chances, if I was running for office, that I would be labeled, in a negative way, for sharing this deficiency I have regarding homosexuality?