justin_o_guy2 wrote on 01/17/16 at 00:37:43:After seeing stupidity made a cause celeb in policy for decades, I can't imagine NOT bringing them in. I pick
Worst case scenario
And figure on
That's gonna be policy.
As little as I find to agree with that Bill says, he's right on this.
As he states these people should stay where they are......
I asked that question here, and elsewhere, and I never get a reply as to why we don't help them fix the problems in their own native lands so they can stay????
Seems a logical and best case scenario for all, yes?
The libs are like crickets on the matter, why?
Is it because it would take troops on the ground, most likely?
If yes, I can share that concern, BUT, what is the alternative, to pretend it will all go away if we ignore them?
As ugly as it would be, I believe this option is the only one that can cut away this cancer. I don't for a second think its a cure.....
But the current way of doing things has been an abject failure.
Obama tried a different method, nothing wrong with that, only that for some reason this guy can't never admit he was wrong, sad.
A perfect example of his mindset and ego was the last election.....
He stated he was on every ballot, his ideas, etc, and people should vote to empower his polices over opposition....
After the results, it wasn't him or his polices that lost.....
according to him.
I think a global coalition is coming into view on dealing with these Islamic Terrorist. These terrorist have shown no border is safe, nor exempt.
We can share this common responsibility to root out these barbarians and assign the need to decimate on that merit, not on politicizing its about cheap oil.
That is a man beyond reasoning.