I think his running mate is emerging........

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/12/loretta-sanchez-muslims-caliphate-terro...

And this poll is just scary, if true.
If you consider the margin of error, that is really a dead heat.

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/12/donald-trump-muslim-ban-poll-216655

why did they apologize? was it really 2 in 5 ?

I might have a certain understanding, maybe sympathy for a cause.
But I don't support them.

Agreeing, or sympathizing with an underlying cause that may sprout the ugly head of terrorism is very different to actively 'supporting' them, as per the newspaper article.

I'm not even a supporter of Greenpeace, Troops Out Movement, Amnesty International, Friends of the Earth, or any political party or any newspaper.

(And not a Mizzou student,   )

Yes, the media certainly love it, but the public buy it........

BTW.....
I think those Christians who buy into the press and trump, etc, don't even see the bright side of the Muslim refugees coming into our country.
They are very devout and overtly display their faith.
We will see prayer considerations and other exceptions to allow them to practise their faith where currently it is under attack or not allowed, by people of the Christian faith, ex: praying at ball games, etc.

If we extend these consideration to one faith, it will have to be to all faiths.
It could get interesting if those of no faith want to impose on the Muslims restrictions on how they can practise their faith.

pg wrote on 12/11/15 at 14:38:38:



You know in all walks of life people believe something, even if it to not believe in anything, that is believing  
However, we have zealots in all those beliefs, but in the end it is not sustainable. That alone will cause it's own demise.
Everyone else, know that using force or power will only invite the same against them/you.
Who wants to live under such a threat?
Is that a good way to live?
Most people would say no.
And when I use the word most, I think it's a staggering number compared to the other......
But of course, that makes no salable news reporting....

verslagen1 wrote on 12/11/15 at 15:23:33:



Yes.... you are so right.
Isn't it the Kurdish Muslims who have been hammered by them?

thumperclone wrote on 12/11/15 at 22:15:09:


What do you mean?

in the end, none of this is really going to matter because Donald Trump will not have a VP candidate. When the voting starts in the primaries trumps real appeal to Republican voters will show up. I suspect the media has been over inflating his real poll numbers.  I think there's a couple reasons for this. Number one by showing Donald Trump, who is somewhat bombastic to begin with, as a mainstream Republican candidate it makes all Republicans look bad. Secondly by showing him that way it helps avoid the valid points that he's raising such as  Mexican immigration, Islamic terrorist, etc. Finally, it's a clever way to lump Cruz and Rubio  together with Donald Trump. This means a clown like John Kasich appeals more.  I think that's demonstrated by a supposedly leaked memo from Hillary's campaign saying they were most afraid of John Kasich. What a joke. Hillary could take a three month vacation during the campaign and beat Kasich by 20 points.