"Now that was an answer that speaks volumes about you."

Sir, it would appear that you would rather cast aspersions than commit to an intelligent exchange of ideas and opinions.

Mr.Guy 2, you have hit the proverbial nail on the head.

You have issues Mr.Mark.

JOG; I read a dozen or more sites regularly. Fox is just one of them and to discount them completely is silly. Like I said, Bengazi would be dead (like those 4 people) without them. No organization is perfect but please don't fall into the simplistic 'Fox Lies' bull$h!t put forth by hard core liberals. Fox is as good a major news organization as there is, but I certainly agree a person needs to supplement and get information from numerous sources.

I have a shortwave radio in the shop. If im in there, its on, & I dont get to listen to JUST what I want. I am stuck with some radio hosts that I dont agree with a good bit of the time. I listen to Hannity, Beck, Fox stuff,, BUT, I also get Alex Jones & HE tells whats happening. Now , he gets casrried away sometimes. I have to turn it down & let him rant. But for content, I havent beat his show. He interviews Generals & people who have access to info that youll never see on Fox.
I check G Edward Griffins REality Zone every friday, Fox news sells the same pablum that allowed our parents & grandparents to be conned into the spot we are in, Just enough truth to let people know things arent okay, not enough to know whats actually going on,.Fox tell ya about the Bilderbergers? IDK, I dont watch news on TV, hardly ever.& while EVERYBODY was running Michael Jackson, 24 /7 , Nobody ( except Jones) covered the meeting in Florida. Ohh, it wasnt a big deal. Just an 8 foot fence around a luxury hotel, no press, no one allowed in except world leaders..no biggeee..

There’s a very telling story told from years ago. The story goes that at some point in the past, a news division exec told the president of the network he had good news and bad news for him.  The good news was the news division turned a profit for the first time. The bad news was the news division turned a profit for the first time. News went from being thought of mostly as a public service to yet another revenue producing activity of a giant corporation. Walter Cronkite became a star, a celebrity and his factually incorrect comments about Vietnam swayed public opinion.
Now out of 23 minutes of network news where the majority of the country (voters!) get their information from, a good chunk of that is absolutely worthless, cute little fluff pieces. The real news is too complicated to cover in depth so you get the briefest summary which in the case of the 3 major over the air networks and 2 out of 3 major cable outlets, is heavily slanted to the left.

And that is how a failed president got re-elected despite a disastrous first term in which almost (all?) every policy aspects he promised to address had grown worse.