srinath wrote on 07/05/13 at 11:01:45:Pine wrote on 07/05/13 at 10:44:25:oldNslow wrote on 07/05/13 at 07:07:24: Quote:Really we want to have it both ways.
Sri,
I don't know who the "we" you're refering to are, but I am most assuredly not one of them. I'm not at all interested in "having it both ways" I've said several times on here that I don't want the government to protect me; I want it to leave me alone.
This.. very much this. Way too many bad things occur when government seeks to "protect" the citizens. Make no mistake, the government cares not one bit about the lives lost in 9/11. They do care about the black eye the government got.
What govt is this you're talking about ?
Seriously the whole bravado about "let me keep my guns and I'll protect myself" ... is all the 4 walls of your tiny room, compared to what is nationally @ risk.
Cool.
Srinath
Sri we are agreeing with you!
Can I protect myself?? NO!!!!!!! But I would rather die with all my freedoms intact,,, living my life unhindered... not wondering when I will made "disappeared" for some mis-dialed phone call. Than to life as "kept" and "protected".
Nothing ... nothing is more important than freedom. National Security .. either it serves ME and my freedom... or I am enslaved to it. Many country's enjoy a higher standard of living than the US... don't think I want to move Arabia any time soon. I could probably earn more money in CHINA than here... but money is not the point. Hell, if I want to be "protected" I would move to North Korea.
Now to be sure, an intelligence machine is needed, and classified info that I don't need to know about and all. And sure, efforts and diligence is needed to protect the country at large. But the second that "national security" reduces the liberty and freedom of everyone, not based on crimes or even intent.. but simply based phishing... the line is crossed. The USA system relies on the assumption of innocence. The phone logs assumes the guilt of everyone.