Maybe so, but maybe not.

It was just revealed Yuri Gagarin(?) the first Russian in space died because another pilot flew to close to him. Which is not the story they told when died. They withheld the truth because they wanted to use him for propaganda.

It's unlikely there was anything sinister about 800. Worst case sceniro a military missile launched accidentally and that was covered up. The most likely explanation is what the investigators suggest. The streak of light was burning fuel that leaked out.

Here's what I'd like to know. This "documentary" is being done with 17 of the original investigators. How many investigators were there total? Why did they wait this long? How many of the 17 could be classified as 9/11 truthers?

you KNEW the oFISHYal story was a lie..  because you think everything is a plot.

Why is it you guys ascribe pristine moral standards to anyone making a video playing into your anti-government fears?. ....Every single major event you seem to think has been orchestrated by a group with all-encompassing powers of control and persuasion. Someone comes along using random links and innuendo and clever ‘snake-oil salesman’ verbiage and you’re the first one in line with a pitch fork ready to storm the castle.  (you 4 guys could sit on someone’s jury?……)  No wonder OJ got off......

I’m suggesting there is about .0001% chance flt 800 was an accidental missile launch. My point was to compare this to the recent news about the Russians hiding the true cause of death of Gugarian.

justin_o_guy2 wrote on 06/21/13 at 06:52:38:


Does this theory require that a plane was loaded with people, but no suitcases or seats?...
Why?...
Better yet,.. why not load it with seats and luggage, but no people?...
I don't see such an odd factoid supporting any theory...

This is the problem with most conspiracy theories... they have details that point away from the established story,... but they lack any logical plan...
911 for instance.... Why would they arrange to have planes flown into the buildings when they already wired them for demolition?...
Why, instead not have the story that terrorists wired the buildings?...
Apparently, security was lax enough to allow it, because according the theory, the MIB managed it in at least 3 buildings simultaneously without anyone ever seeing a thing... (and just to make it challenging, they added 4 hijackings and a bait n' switch with a missile or two... Why?... just to make it look cool?...

Nonsense...
...(if you want to convince me,... don't just repeat those fragmented factoids about metals and gravities, missing pieces of whatever...
Give me a chain of logic and reason for MIB's to concoct such a plan, and have the remotest expectation of success...

Even the simplest plans can go awry... complex ones always do... I expect MIB's are very aware of this...

So,.. lay it out for me, step by step, how and why a group of expert planners would do this... and how many people and resources it would involve...
... and most especially, why it would be assumed possible...

Everything is a lie, and a conspiracy...   ...

Jog, for the millionth time, read the pentagon building performance report and see whst they say about nosegear for example.

Then don't ever try telling me you base your positions on investigating all the facts cause that's bulls*t. If you can't botherd reading the report written by a group of professional engineers who had the best access,  then you can't be taken seriously. You've got no right saying "they're hiding this" or asking "what about that" when all you really want to do is watch a YouTube video, post the link and then start your usual anti-government rant.

Forget then, I'm done with your stupid conspiracy crap. You're a joke if you won't read the very document all your fellow nut jobs say is loaded with lies...... How would know since you didn't even read it?!!!  You have no idea what you're even talking about......