WebsterMark, before I begin answering you, I must ask. Did you even look at the photos of what hit the Pentagon?
http://thewebfairy.com/911/pentagon/frames/boston.com/pentagon1_big.jpghttp://www.edwardsdavid.com/media/msnbc/images/msnbc_911_pentagon_plane_vid_0...What do you see in these photos that were released by the Pentagon March 7, 2002?
I expect an Answer.
Now I shall reply to you. Even though you failed to reply with an answer as to what in the video was not true. You instead replied with questions. But questions are good, I certainly have many concerning 9/11/2001, and I certainly don’t have all the answers.
Now to begin…..
According to the governments’ conspiracy theory, Hani Hanjour is credited with being the airplane's pilot. Three weeks before September 11, Hanjour attempted to rent a Cessna at an airfield Bowie, Maryland. Suspicious of his dubious 'pilot's license', officials at the airfield insisted he take a chaperoned test-flight before rental would be approved. He failed his test flight miserably. He could neither control, nor properly land the Cessna. In fact, the instructors at the airfield in Maryland said, "It was like he had hardly even ever driven a car. He could not fly at all." And yet, the government demand that we believe Hanjour pulled off a stunt that would press the limits of even the most experienced aviation test pilot.
Not only that but we are to believe that Hanjoir fought his way into he thingy pit armed with a razor blade and overcame the 6’4” former Marine combat pilot and the others in the cockpit. Then this man who couldn’t fly a Cessna, managed to fly a complicated commercial airliner from the Ohio/Kentucky border to Washington D.C. flying over 500miles per hour at 7 miles above the ground. Doing so, he successfully managed to find Washington D.C. and entered the most restricted airspace in the world without encountering a single military intercept and that despite the crash of two other known hijacked aircraft into the WTC, and a missing third, being covered on every radio and television station in the country that morning.
Having reach the Pentagon, Hanjoir is claimed to bypass the opportunity to not hit the section directly in front of him, the section that contains all the top brass, but chooses instead to make extreme maneuvers that would stress a fighter jet. Then flying +500 mph level just mere feet above the lawn surface, he strikes the FIRST FLOOR. First let me say here that when an airliner lands, it does so at 150mph. At 500mph, the down-wash would be too great to allow control of the plane to keep it level.
You asked, “If this particular part of the building was selected for destruction because they were about to uncover a scam, are you saying the towers in New York were destroyed just as part of a cover up? “
Yes and no. Building 7, the Solomon Building, housed many documents relating to numerous SEC investigations. The files for approximately three to four thousand cases were destroyed including 45 active cases, and this destruction benefited the government.
Among the destroyed documents were ones that may have demonstrated the relationship between Citigroup and the WorldCom bankruptcy. Also all the files for the ENRON investigation.
Perhaps even more interesting than the loss of these case files is the fact that WTC 7's collapse destroyed the OEM's command center on the 23rd floor.
Who else benefited from the attacks on the WTC? For one Larry Silverstein who had just signed a 99 year lease for the buildings that were destroyed. The WTC had an asbestos problem that required a major fortune to rectify. Also Larry Silberstein placed terror attack insurance mere weeks before the attacks and collected 7.1 billion dollars. Wow! Now that sure is luck.
Another interesting bit of Building 7 information is that both the BBC and Fox News broadcast that it had collapsed 23 minutes before it did. They were given the same script. What’s that Webster? Script you ask? Why yes…. Because whe CNN reporter Aaron Brown starts reading the script as handed to him, he realizes that building 7 is still standing and corrects himself.
WebsterMark, you stated, “but only you would have the wherewithal to not be fooled like these others who apparently have below average brain power and curiosity?” No, not only me, judging from the hundreds of articles concerning the Pentagon attack and the many thousands of comments found on the internet, there are many that come to such conclusions and I for one do not consider those that have other conclusions to have “below average brain power” but rather I believe that they have been misinformed.
As far as the eye witness reports, I recall that during the first day and days afterwards, the eyewitness reports were very varied, with many differing descriptions including many that claimed the object was too small to have been a commercial airliner. Since removed, the FAA’s own website, for months afterwards also showed that Flight 77 and Flight 11 were not scheduled to have flown on September 11, 2001.
Pages: 
