WebsterMark wrote on 05/23/13 at 04:15:16:This is an attitude I can't understand. I guess that's why we will always see things differently Star. Cut down to 39 hours, lost your benefits and what do you do? Sit there, pregnant dog and moan; take it 'like a man"?
Screw that, walk away and work someplace else. If you're gonna let youself get screwed over; then whose fault is it really? We're all free agents. You don't like we're you're working, find some place else. If everyone did that, the laws of supply and demand would come into play and employers would be forced to alter what they do in order to attract workers. When we sit back and allow unions or government rules to do our dirty work for us, this is what we get.
This is a BS line of reasoning. Why ?
1. If you walk away - you will starve to death in short order.
2. The other companies in your town have all got the memo, and they have done the same thing.
3. The employment policy usually is last in - first out, as in it rewards seniority.
If we had an infinite life span, as well as an ability to pay our bille and live and continue our normal life when looking for work, this idea is feasible.
You dont want employees to collude and collectively bargain.
The companies are colluding and collectively bargaining. Lets try this - how did citi group, B of A, JPMC, wachovia, wells fargo, GMAC, countrywide, washington mutual, lehmann brothers, Bear stearns and AIG all demand for a bail out on the same day or within a few days of each other ?
Yea ... the management of those companies have 100% collusion.
A non unionized single worker will starve to death if he walks away from a job in protest just cos they cut his hours and benefits.
Cool.
Srinath.