I have done 0-60 runs on mine with a Veypor computer installed so the times and speeds were accurate.  When installing the Veypor part of the setup is measuring the outside circumferance of the rear wheel to within 0.1", which will result in the speed being accurate to within 0.1 mph.
The 0-60 time is calculated by built in 3 axis accelerametors which activate the chosen program the instant the bike starts to move.
There is a difference in my bike from what you were asking however, and that is that my engine did have a modified camshaft.  The outside end of the exhaust port had been opened slightly but no other port work was done.  So the results I am posting are not exactly what you are looking for but it will give you an idea of what the Savage can do.

Since then, during the past year, the intake and exhaust ports have been modified significantly and 0.040" removed from the head and cylinder to increase compression, but the bike is not yet back together so there is no data available for the recent changes.

The following 0-60 mph time was done in the late summer or early fall of 2006.

0-60 mph  in 4.9 sec

Oh boy.....

   You guys are my new best friends! Better numbers than my old `78 XS650 which ate & spat out HD`s for laughs.

    Mike....tell me about your cam shaft, can I get one? $$$? I think I recall reading about your porting, I will search the tech section. Uh, did you notice what kind of MPG you were getting w/o `hot-rodding", just cruising around?

    Odar...what jet sizes did you settle for? Know what altitude you are at? Same question about MPG, as the $$$ of fuel is going up up up, even for Vikings. Nice looking ride,too.

                      `Gimme fuel, gimme fire'
                                 Metallica

Thanks, guys!

Hell, Billy

Well Mikey, guess I`ll start looking. I`m having a lot of fun with this bike, each round of mods seems to pay off bigtime.

Prob`ly wait awhile to do the cam thing, it`s brand new, barely 3000 on it yet, but no harm hunting bike parts down for later. I`m still fine tuning the carb,and by swapping to a Super Trapp, a solo saddle and installing a bobbed Fatboy front on the rear--that should strip quite a bit more weight off.

I can keep going on this bike for years, it`s a great starting point and I am not a bit surprised that you & Odar are getting this kinda performance. The motor is in such a mild state of tune stock that it practically begs to be opened up, but the torque and the weight are what got me convinced to grab one. 650cc at 352 lbs [and going way down] is off the hook for a street bike/cruiser. It continues to impress me.

Well thanks guys that`s all I needed to know, that the potential for more horsepower is really there.

Cool,

B

   HA! Inconsistent demeanor, you got it, that`s me, how`d ya know??...actually I really don`t care how fast Suzi will go on the long end, but, rather how QUICK she`ll get there. There`s a difference, R J.

   I find that-for me anyway- going over about 75 on an unfared bike, well, you`re holding on for dear life, but gettin` out of  the way in a hurry, that`s another matter. Nimbleness and quick responce are very useful. I have gone fast before, but now I more enjoy going quick. Sometimes I like to go real slow, too. Depends on the mood or situation.

             TORQUE!! More important than HP, esp. in a thumper.

   ......or we could discuss aberrant behavior in the aging motorcyclist, if you want.Or life style choices, or the difficulty of making decisions ....or the sanity & practicality of riding on 2 wheels to begin with. Hey, why do bikers plaster skulls all over everything...or those Gre***n bells, or why I won`t spell the word out even?

    So do you consider yourself sane RJ????? I know that sometimes it feels like Chicago O`Hare inside my noggin. That might just be why I HAVE to ride, to shut it all out. To get focused......besides the shear pleasure, of course.

   And, btw, John, have you clocked your bike? What are you running?

   B