Donate!
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register :: View Members
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Send Topic Print
pistons again! (Read 35 times)
Yonuh Adisi FSO
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

Savage Jedi (Knight)

Posts: 3622
Pilot Valley NV, aka Tatooine
Gender: male
Re: pistons again!
Reply #15 - 02/27/07 at 16:19:52
 
Once I get up the money I plan on completely rebuilding my engine and I would love to put in a dome piston.

BTW does anyone make a roller cam and lifter kit for the Savage? I think that would be pretty sweet.
Back to top
 
 

Check out Flight of Destiny http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00H9130XC
  IP Logged
LesGolden
Full Member
***
Offline

Just a thumpin' away
at life.

Posts: 113
Coastal GA
Gender: male
Re: pistons again!
Reply #16 - 03/22/07 at 22:15:24
 
Ross pistons 4 for 100 a piece!  Or close to that anyway..  hmm wonder how much more to have valve reliefs cut in try for maybe 9.5:1-10:1..  Anyone interested in a group buy?  maybe go for 96-97mm bore?  Easier to get 4 people than the twentysome for Wiseco, course i don't know anything about the quality of Ross pistons..
Back to top
 
 

You just gotta take the high road
Leave old lovers on the low
Raise your face and smile baby
There's somewhere you gonna go...
on your ls650
  IP Logged
Kropatchek
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

Why more than 1
cylinder?

Posts: 1457
Alphen a/d Rijn  Netherlands
Gender: male
Re: pistons again!
Reply #17 - 03/23/07 at 03:09:48
 
Compression RATIO can only increase if you decrease the combustion chamber volume. Assuming all other parts remain the same.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compression_ratio

A compressor ( or hairdryer) will increase the filling of the cylinder with more air/fuel mixture.
Back to top
 
 

Never ask your bike to scream before her throat is warm.
'93 Sav in '96 ( yellow) looks
  IP Logged
LesGolden
Full Member
***
Offline

Just a thumpin' away
at life.

Posts: 113
Coastal GA
Gender: male
Re: pistons again!
Reply #18 - 03/23/07 at 05:41:03
 
Kropatchek wrote on 12/31/69 at 16:00:03:
Compression RATIO can only increase if you decrease the combustion chamber volume. Assuming all other parts remain the same.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compression_ratio

A compressor ( or hairdryer) will increase the filling of the cylinder with more air/fuel mixture.



Was this reply for me?  If so, i agree! 4 of us should get some domed pistons with, if necessary for the savage, valve reliefs so as not to destroy our valves with the taller pistons.  oh and more specifically increasing compression ratio involves changing the cylinder volumes at bdc and tdc.  a larger piston will increase compression because the volume at bdc has increased more than the volume at tdc.  just my two cents.  i just really want to up my power and was hoping to get a few people to bite on some bigger pistons.
Back to top
 
 

You just gotta take the high road
Leave old lovers on the low
Raise your face and smile baby
There's somewhere you gonna go...
on your ls650
  IP Logged
wvhunter62
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline



Posts: 35

Gender: male
Re: pistons again!
Reply #19 - 03/23/07 at 05:57:33
 
I've used Ross products before in automotive rebuilds, quality as good or better than OEM. I'm in for a 96mm Wiesco or Ross.
Back to top
 
 

When you receive the news that my guns have been confiscated,you will know that I am dead.
  IP Logged
vroom1776
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline



Posts: 2110

Gender: male
Re: pistons again!
Reply #20 - 03/23/07 at 09:20:53
 
Here are the results of some calculations for flat head pistons with no valve cutouts I did a while ago... VH = volume of the head, i.e. size of the combustion chamber

Bore(mm),Extra_Piston_Height(mm),Displacement(cc),VH(cc),CR
94      0      652.3      87.0      8.5 (stock)
94      1      652.3      80.0      9.2
94      2      652.3      73.1      9.9
94      3      652.3      66.2      10.9
95      0      666.3      87.0      8.7 (lancer?)
95      1      666.3      79.9      9.3
95      2      666.3      72.8      10.2
95      3      666.3      65.7      11.1
96      0      680.4      87.0      8.8
96      1      680.4      79.7      9.5
96      2      680.4      72.5      10.4
96      3      680.4      65.3      11.4
97      0      694.6      87.0      9.0 (woodworker ?)
97      1      694.6      79.6      9.7
97      2      694.6      72.2      10.6
97      3      694.6      64.8      11.7

I posted similar calcs previosly, but there was a minor msitake in the comp ratio for a 94 mm piston and 1 mm taller.

uh let me check these again...  I think these #s are okay,

VH is calulated by:
VH = VHstock-ExtraPistonHeight*(PI*(bore/2)^2)

CR is calculated by:
CR = (Displacement+VH)/VH

For the extra height pistons, this is saying that when the engine is as TDC, the piston will go above the cylinder and into the combustion chamber.  If we go w/ over bore pistons, we also need to know if they will fit inside the combustion chamber, as well as if they will smack the valvies. (unless I don't get it)
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
LesGolden
Full Member
***
Offline

Just a thumpin' away
at life.

Posts: 113
Coastal GA
Gender: male
Re: pistons again!
Reply #21 - 03/23/07 at 12:08:15
 
Thank you vroom! That's some good info to have! I would've done something similar except that my math skills suck.
Back to top
 
 

You just gotta take the high road
Leave old lovers on the low
Raise your face and smile baby
There's somewhere you gonna go...
on your ls650
  IP Logged
LesGolden
Full Member
***
Offline

Just a thumpin' away
at life.

Posts: 113
Coastal GA
Gender: male
Re: pistons again!
Reply #22 - 03/23/07 at 12:22:11
 
Okay, to get a little more serious about a group order, looking at these figures, and considering the previous post about a 9.5 piston from wiseco, i'm guessing we could do 96mm with 2mm additional height and minor valve clearances   that should get us around 10:1-10.4:1, i'm not sure how much compression we would lose with the valve cutouts.. i'm guessing those figures are with flat top pistons?  might be able to do a 2mm higher dome top and forgo any valve destroying problems..   the earlier decision for the 9.5's from wiseco was based on valve clearance right?  i think we could get away with closer to 10:1 with the right pistons and that with a 2mm overbore should give some pretty serious gains.. We'll probably need the higher duration cam to go with it.  Most likely need to run premium too..  SE GA has 93 everywhere and with a 2.5 gallon tank i'd be fine with that..  i don't think 10:1 would need any higher octane, and if we're not changing deck height timing should be okay.. shouldn't it?  hmm..  anyone else have any thoughts on this?  And anyone else ready to make a group order?  just need 4 of us, i'm in, cash in hand.  think i'll do the cam same time..  (gonna need a carb too huh? ...  maybe lancer wants to put together a package deal?)
Back to top
 
 

You just gotta take the high road
Leave old lovers on the low
Raise your face and smile baby
There's somewhere you gonna go...
on your ls650
  IP Logged
vroom1776
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline



Posts: 2110

Gender: male
Re: pistons again!
Reply #23 - 03/23/07 at 12:28:05
 
yes, those are for flat head pistons.

Small cut outs for the valvies would increase the VH by maybe 5 cc at most, is my guess... lowering the comperssion ratio by some small amount (maybe 0.2 ?).

the one thing I'm not sure about, and maybe this is just do to my lack of experience, but would the combustion chamber need to be bored out to accomodate a taller &/or oversize psiton in addition to the cylinder ?  That would affect the above calculations A LOT!
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
vroom1776
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline



Posts: 2110

Gender: male
Re: pistons again!
Reply #24 - 03/23/07 at 13:13:40
 
here are the numbers for spherical dome pistons w/ no valve cutouts:

Bore(mm),Extra_Piston_Height(mm),Displacement(cc),VH(cc),CR
94      0      652.3      87.0      8.5
94      1      652.3      83.5      8.8
94      2      652.3      80.0      9.2
94      3      652.3      76.6      9.5
95      0      666.3      87.0      8.7
95      1      666.3      83.4      9.0
95      2      666.3      79.9      9.3
95      3      666.3      76.3      9.7
96      0      680.4      87.0      8.8
96      1      680.4      83.4      9.2
96      2      680.4      79.7      9.5
96      3      680.4      76.1      9.9
97      0      694.6      87.0      9.0
97      1      694.6      83.3      9.3
97      2      694.6      79.6      9.7
97      3      694.6      75.9      10.2

this is on the assumption that the head doesn't have to be messed with.

The formula I used for the dome is:
ExtraVolume = 1/6*pi*Extra_Piston_Height*(3*(bore/2)^2 + Extra_Piston_Height^2).  Got the formula from my math text...  Then I used the same equation for VH & CR as above.


Here is a link to the spherical cap volume. Equation 2
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
vroom1776
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline



Posts: 2110

Gender: male
Re: pistons again!
Reply #25 - 03/23/07 at 13:30:27
 
I stole these pics from greg.  Hope you dont mind Greg!

combustion chamber:


piston in cyl:


greg, can you put any type of scale on the combustion chamber pic?  It's prolly got to be on one of the flat surfaces, maybe from bolt to bolt?
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
vroom1776
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline



Posts: 2110

Gender: male
Re: pistons again!
Reply #26 - 03/23/07 at 13:40:05
 
okay, so does the piston come all the way up to be flush with the top of the cylinder?  If so, it looks like the combustion chamber/head would have to be bored to accomodate an oversized, taller piston...  or am I missing something here?  It's not like the gaskets would be tall/thick enough to take care of that...
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
vroom1776
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline



Posts: 2110

Gender: male
Re: pistons again!
Reply #27 - 03/23/07 at 16:06:55
 
So, based on the two above pics and the fact that that the piston is 94 mm wide, the narrowest point on the flat surface of the combustion chamber (i.e. between the words "Intake" & "Exhaust") is ABOUT 59.1 mm.  I say "about" because of the various aspect ratios of the photos and the  fact that I used straight lines to determine this (the photos are a little crooked).

SO, unless I am missing something, we would need to bore the head/cumbustion chamber at least a little to fit a taller piston in there.

OR AM I CRAZY?
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
vroom1776
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline



Posts: 2110

Gender: male
Re: pistons again!
Reply #28 - 03/23/07 at 16:13:24
 
What I want to know is, what's our deck height?



link
Anyone know how thick the gaskets are?
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
LesGolden
Full Member
***
Offline

Just a thumpin' away
at life.

Posts: 113
Coastal GA
Gender: male
Re: pistons again!
Reply #29 - 03/23/07 at 18:39:53
 
Reading back and checking around it seems wiseco know what they're talking about, crowned pistons with valve cutouts seem to be the route to go.  It does seem like anything further would take modifying the combustion chamber.  There may be enough squish area (thanks for the link vroom) for a slightly taller piston, but that was probably considered when deciding on the 9.5.. Still though, maybe we should take advantage of the much smaller buy in from Ross and get some 96mm's made?
Back to top
 
 

You just gotta take the high road
Leave old lovers on the low
Raise your face and smile baby
There's somewhere you gonna go...
on your ls650
  IP Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Send Topic Print


« Home

 
« Home
SuzukiSavage.com
09/23/24 at 10:24:10



General CategoryRubber Side Down! › pistons again!


SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2!
YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved.