An electrician would have invoices, he didn't work for free did he?

 He has records showing the exact dates he was there.  However to certain individuals, anyone "named" in the files is a child rapist, so even though he, among hundreds and hundreds of other people have been to the Island when no parties or guests were there, they are all "guilty bastids" until proven innocent.

 Also no evidence will be accepted that shows they are innocent.  So they are all "guilty bastids" since there is no way to prove a negative.

Imagining my response again, are you?

 Imagining I mean only you again, are you?  I specifically said social media.


Of course EVERYONE who ever went to Epstein Island were not pedo rapists. Hired laborers aren't billionaires who think their money magically makes them above the law. They lack the batshit crazy greed genes that somehow also makes them want to bang children. I doubt the electrician counted as a guest.

 While I agree, all it takes is a simple social media post to ruin someone's family and career.  Look how many completely false social media posts have been used on this forum as evidence.  I mean how many missiles hit that aircraft carrier?  

 This guy is "named" in the files and as such must consider the repercussions from the "guilty until proven innocent" crowd that uses social media as evidence and not actual evidence.  

 If he were a millionaire electrician would he be more guilty than if he made less?

Are any of those thousand women accusing an electrician?  a plumber?
a gardener?

 They don't need to.  The premise of online blanket accusations has nothing to do with the accuracy of the claim.  This forum is a very good example.  Week after week literally anything online is true - if it aligns with a belief.  

 I mean look at how many people in the Tall Table have been accused of raping children with literally zero evidence to support it.  Why wouldn't a man "named" multiple times in the Epstein files be a "pedo" too?  That's how online accusations work: Make accusation, repeat, repeat, repeat.....

Do you deny the more than 1,000 women with direct knowledge?

 No.  No amount of acknowledging that an electrician is "named" in the Epstein files, and that can damage his life, means I am denying anything else, of any topic, anywhere.

 
You said you can't prove a negative, but argue that you can't prove a positive

 I disagree.  I think if humans are going to say that any male that is "named" in the Epstein files is a pedophile, and they are "guilty" unless they can prove they did not rape kids, that is making the "guilty" prove a negative.  

 I never said anything close to not proving humans did commit crimes.  My statement is that humans use social media as fact, so that means any male "named" in the Epstein files is a "guilty bastid" until he proves he never committed a crime.  

 Look how many times people on here use social media posts, and argue, sometimes for years, that those made-up posts are true.  

Who is this electrician that is named and what did they say accuse him of?

 He would prefer I not be providing additional references and I understand why so in this case I am not going to provide specific reference.  This is nothing new to this forum.  If you think I am fabricating this, that is fine.

 He is "named" as his name exists in the Epstein files as a contracted electrician.  He also appears on flight records.  He is not formally accused of anything, which is not a requirement to be a "guilty bastid" by means of repeated claims of such on social media.


He is already "named" in the Epstein files... but you won't tell me where and in relation to what
What harm can you do here, compared to his being named in the actual Epstein files?

 I have been asked not to provide his name so I am not going to.  The potential harm, which I have a hard time believing you don't understand, is that accusations on social media can ruin a business.  I mean Yelp and other review sites literally had to make algorithms to combat the false review metrics because it can cripple businesses.  They were sued over this.



Do you imagine any one of the 1,000 or so girls would be willing to perjure herself to falsely accuse this random individual?

 No, I never said any of the girls.  I have said, multiple times, social media posts.  Random and repeated social media posts.  My point is there doesn't need to be any credibility, there just has to be repeated accusations on social media.

Don't see any electricians listed here
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_named_in_the_Epstein_files

I will choose not to believe
Which I'm sure you'll approve of, seeing as it's just a social media rumour that you brought up on this site
Do you not see the hypocrisy?

Maybe I'm on the list

I'll never know because I'll never read 3 million pages to find out
and I'm not too worried about it because nobody cares anyway
We care that many of out nations leaders are on the list
including our President.... very prominently
and they have the power and influence to get away with it

Serowbot wrote on 06/01/26 at 10:08:17:


1,000 women? Are you insane or just retarded? Seriously, got to be one or the other? 90% of the main stream media hate Trump more than anyone in the life. Prosecutors across the country have pushed the envelope in filing charges against Trump. Are you telling me there are 1,000 women with legitimate claims against Trump and no one has a video? 1,000 women in modeling, acting or other social media rich occupations who all have cell phones, Instagram, TicTok accounts, and no one has provided video to the media or prosecutors?

Get yourself a cranium anus removal tool.