|
SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Two TV Shows /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1728532546 Message started by MnSpring on 10/09/24 at 20:55:44 |
|
Title: Two TV Shows Post by MnSpring on 10/09/24 at 20:55:44 Leave it to Beaver / Father knows best, and like. Survivor / Big Brother, and like. One taught kids to be Honest, Trustworthy, and how to work to get rewards. One teaches kids to Cheat, Lie, and not have to work to get rewards. Rather easy to see who will vote for the Cackling Hen who cannot lay eggs. |
|
Title: Re: Two TV Shows Post by Eegore on 10/10/24 at 05:13:57 A large part of that was due to the Standards and Practices Censorship from NARTB. For instance Lucille Ball could not use the word "pregnant". Not because they had too high of a standard, but because the censorship blocked it. There was a constant back and forth between what was or could be filmed and what the censorship would allow. Entire episodes were filmed but never approved for airing. TV won't do it on it's own, it never has thus the invention of NARTB. So all we need in order to bring TV back to it's more ethical standards is to bring back more Corporate and Government censorship. |
|
Title: Re: Two TV Shows Post by MnSpring on 10/10/24 at 05:57:47 123230382532570 wrote:
Thanks for your OPINION, and Spin that it is Censorship's fault. That censorship was a thing of it's time, like twin beds in a MARRIED couple bedroom, and Smoking advertising by Doctors, etc. Censorship has nothing to do with TEACHING MOLDABLE young people. They can be tought to be Honest, Trustworthy, Ethical, and realize those attributes lead to rewards. Or they can be tought, one must Lie, Cheat. And being dishonest, leads to rewards. As, most, TV, news WEB sights, Social WEB sites, School Teachers, Parents, Politicians, etc, etc, etc, do. |
|
Title: Re: Two TV Shows Post by Serowbot on 10/10/24 at 06:59:37 Tacky reality shows have a higher profit margin Cheap to produce, and scandal sells Quality is expensive Garbage is cheap Don't like them, don't watch Problem is, a lot of tasteless low IQ people will watch The Apprentice for instance You weren't a fan? Go figure :-? |
|
Title: Re: Two TV Shows Post by MnSpring on 10/10/24 at 07:17:36 Or the 'View', and any of the Oprah shows. (... from a reliable source, like CCN, where you sat on the couch, with your Bon-Bons, and were glued to the TV) |
|
Title: Re: Two TV Shows Post by Serowbot on 10/10/24 at 07:18:38 Nobody voted Woopie President |
|
Title: Re: Two TV Shows Post by thumperclone on 10/10/24 at 10:00:30 the JFK era, Cuban missile crisis, Viet Nam, etc. |
|
Title: Re: Two TV Shows Post by Eegore on 10/10/24 at 10:51:52 Thanks for your OPINION, and Spin that it is Censorship's fault. Oh did I forget to declare my post is the same as all other posts on this forum and is an opinion? For those incapable of understanding what an opinion is, this post is an opinion. Censorship has nothing to do with TEACHING MOLDABLE young people. NARTB section specific to children specifies, specifically, "education of children" in the very first sentence. My opinion is that education, and TEACHING are the same thing. Censorship attempted to teach values. 1. The education of children involves giving them a sense of the world at large. Crime, violence, and sex are a part of the world they will be called upon to meet, and a certain amount of proper presentation of such is helpful in orienting the child to his surroundings. However, violence and illicit sex shall not be presented in an attractive manner, nor to an extent such as will lead a child to believe that they play a greater part in life than they do. They should not be presented, without indications of the resultant retribution and punishment. 2. It is not enough that only those programs which are intended for viewing by children shall be suitable to the young and immature. Television is responsible for insuring that programs of all sorts which occur during the times of day when children may normally be expected to have the opportunity of viewing television shall exercise care in the following regards: (a) In affording opportunities for cultural growth as well as for wholesome entertainment. (b) In developing programs to foster and promote the commonly accepted moral, social, and ethical ideals characteristic of American life. (c) In reflecting respect for parents, for honorable behavior, and for the constituted authorities of the American community. (d) In eliminating reference to kidnapping of children or threats of kidnapping. (e) In avoiding material which is excessively violent or would create morbid suspense, or other undesirable reactions in children. (f) In exercising particular restraint and care in crime or mystery episodes involving children or minors. To say censorship has "nothing" to do with TEACHING MOLDABLE is like saying standards in education has nothing to do with teaching because all teachers do the right thing. We know this is not true, and mega-corporations are certainly no better. TV Networks are corporations designed to make money. They were not attempting to maintain an ethical standard for the sake of TEACHING, but instead created programs designed to sell ads, or make money. NARTB was developed specifically because TV networks, on their own, would not prioritize the lower-income programming designed for ethical TEACHING but instead attempted to make more "edgy" programs, or for that matter, ones that sell ads. To reduce the "wild West" of broadcast television, they created their own standards to improve the impact on children, and to reduce Government interference. PBS is a result of the lack of Private Corporation TV wanting to make educational programming. No money in it. You want more ethical TV programming, go back to the 1950's NARTB censorship. That should cover a lot of the problems. |
|
Title: Re: Two TV Shows Post by MnSpring on 10/10/24 at 10:59:47 3B273A223F2A3D2C2320212A4F0 wrote:
And once again, EXACTLY What does that have to do with TEACHING kids today, to Lie, Cheat, Steal, and expect to be REWARDED for those actions. (Oh Wait, they all want to emulate, Harris & Walz) |
|
Title: Re: Two TV Shows Post by Serowbot on 10/10/24 at 11:17:39 5F7C4162607B7C75120 wrote:
Harris Walz?.... Seriously? Is it her 34 felony convictions?, being banned from ever having anything to do with charities?, Adjudicated rapist?, $25 million Trump University payout?, $100 million slander?, $500 million tax evasion?... Kamala who? What did she do? Jaywalk? :-? Are you insane? |
|
Title: Re: Two TV Shows Post by thumperclone on 10/10/24 at 11:29:47 1E3D0023213A3D34530 wrote:
And once again, EXACTLY What does that have to do with TEACHING kids today, to Lie, Cheat, Steal, and expect to be REWARDED for those actions. (Oh Wait, they all want to emulate, Harris & Walz) [/quote] sesame street is still on it's the parents' reasonability to teach their children not T.V. are you really wishing for 60yrs in the past? or is it a feeble mentality that drives your opinions? |
|
Title: Re: Two TV Shows Post by MnSpring on 10/10/24 at 11:55:25 1006110C14010C17630 wrote:
Don't know about Jay Walking DO KNOW, she directly let a criminal out to KILL three people. DO KNOW, she help to fund bail for 2 people in MN who went on to KILL. DO KNOW, she IGNORED the Boarder ILLEGAL influx. DO KNOW, she knows NOTHING about how economics work. DO KNOW, she has NEVER made clear, planed out, policies about something. DO KNOW, she makes 'WORD SALADS" when she knows nothing about the subject, and she actually believes people think she is smart. DO KNOW, she does Sound Bites, just for votes from 18-35 year olds, who just don't know how things work, and the 25-60 to stupid to understand. DO KNOW, she knows what can happen when she follows the instructions of the UL Socialists Puppet masters. (See 'Sound Bites') "...Are you insane?..." |
|
Title: Re: Two TV Shows Post by Serowbot on 10/10/24 at 12:31:33 Why does everything you say sound more like Trump than Kamala? Weird :-? World renowned prosecutor Kamala Career of fighting crime Infamous criminal Trump Career criminal |
|
Title: Re: Two TV Shows Post by MnSpring on 10/10/24 at 13:41:53 6076617C64717C67130 wrote:
Ahh Grasshopper, You forgot, the, S & F, rise to fame !!!!!!! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: Two TV Shows Post by Serowbot on 10/10/24 at 13:53:35 Just 'cause I live in your head, don't mean I can read your mind I have no idea what you're talking about Don't bother to explain I do know it's bullshite |
|
Title: Re: Two TV Shows Post by WebsterMark on 10/10/24 at 15:22:44 World renowned prosecutor Kamala Career of fighting crime WTF are you talking about? World renowned….but she was the first one to drop out of 2020 race because no one gave $hit about what she said? You need help …. |
|
Title: Re: Two TV Shows Post by Serowbot on 10/10/24 at 15:57:16 She was Attorney General of California, the 5th largest economy in the world for 6 years That's a top level prosecutor |
|
Title: Re: Two TV Shows Post by WebsterMark on 10/10/24 at 17:59:25 World renowned……. That’s funny. And she abused her office, letting certain people off, throwing the book at others. And it’s not like California was a beacon of law and order. World renowned alright….. |
|
Title: Re: Two TV Shows Post by MnSpring on 10/10/24 at 18:08:39 744641505746516E425148230 wrote:
A-Yep, and one went on to KILL three people. But hey, that's OK with most of the ULTRA LIBERAL SOCIALISTS ! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: Two TV Shows Post by WebsterMark on 10/10/24 at 19:26:12 And isn’t her husband an a$$hole? Slapping women, hiring bimbos as his secretary, basically a d!ck. |
|
Title: Re: Two TV Shows Post by MnSpring on 10/10/24 at 21:30:15 556760717667704F637069020 wrote:
No shortage of web sights stating those same things, and more. Yet again, not a problem for any of the Socialist Loving, DFI, FDS, Woke, Cackling supporters ! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: Two TV Shows Post by Serowbot on 10/11/24 at 07:54:51 Trump is a saint :-? |
|
Title: Re: Two TV Shows Post by WebsterMark on 10/11/24 at 07:59:30 594F58455D48455E2A0 wrote:
So you agree the First Gentleman is anything but…. |
|
Title: Re: Two TV Shows Post by thumperclone on 10/11/24 at 08:22:44 STILL better than her looney tunes opponent |
|
Title: Re: Two TV Shows Post by WebsterMark on 10/11/24 at 09:18:30 3C203D25382D3A2B2427262D480 wrote:
Another one essentially saying he might be a SOB, but he’s our SOB! |
|
Title: Re: Two TV Shows Post by thumperclone on 10/11/24 at 10:00:06 enjoy yourself wallowing in the mud with him |
|
Title: Re: Two TV Shows Post by Serowbot on 10/11/24 at 11:30:41 "You're fired!" said a famous host of a tacky TV reality show |
|
Title: Re: Two TV Shows Post by WebsterMark on 10/12/24 at 05:14:23 World renowned prosecutor……. i’m still chuckling over that this morning. How the mighty have fallen…..Tell me, do you have a white dudes for Kamala bumper sticker on your bike? |
|
Title: Re: Two TV Shows Post by thumperclone on 10/12/24 at 06:40:10 54774A696B70777E190 wrote:
[b][size=14]A-Yep, and one went on to KILL three people. if you mean Tilman it has been proven false another Fox news STUPID LIE |
|
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |