SuzukiSavage.com - Print Page

SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> No "WARRANT" needed for masks
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1750163485

Message started by Eegore on 06/17/25 at 05:31:25

Title: No "WARRANT" needed for masks
Post by Eegore on 06/17/25 at 05:31:25

CA is proposing a law to prohibit law enforcement from wearing masks on duty.

If there is already a law requiring a "WARRANT" then why is CA proposing these laws? Why is there no mention of the current WARRANT requirements?

http://suzukisavage.com/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1749410695/11

Non-MAGA website references that will probably be called MAGA FAKE websites anyway:

https://sd11.senate.ca.gov/news/senators-wiener-arreguin-announce-legislation-prohibit-local-state-federal-law-enforcement#:~:text=SAN%20FRANCISCO%20%E2%80%93%20Senators%20Scott%20Wiener,in%20the%20state%20of%20California.

https://nypost.com/2025/06/17/us-news/california-dems-propose-legislation-to-ban-face-masks-for-law-enforcement-officers-and-not-protesters-or-criminals/

https://www.cbsnews.com/sanfrancisco/news/california-no-secret-police-act-introduced-sb627-ban-police-face-covering-wiener-arreguin/

https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2025-06-16/new-bill-would-ban-law-enforcement-from-wearing-masks

Title: Re: No "WARRANT" needed for masks
Post by zevenenergie on 06/17/25 at 05:42:22

California Dems Propose Legislation to Ban Face Masks for Law Enforcement Officers — and Not Protesters or Criminals

Yeah, that makes it easier to spot protesters and criminals, so that's a smart move. ;)

Those poor Democrats still don't understand why they weren't re-elected.

Democrats:
I think we should see it this way. As long as everyone behaves according to the law, you don't need the police.

As soon as everyone obeys the law, you don't need the law. 8-)

This to show how much money you can save as a government if you provide good information to the public.

Title: Re: No "WARRANT" needed for masks
Post by WebsterMark on 06/18/25 at 04:24:30

Title: Re: No "WARRANT" needed for masks
Post by zevenenergie on 06/18/25 at 07:28:04

Yes, the left is clearly becoming "the problem" in America.
They were never a fan of democratic values [ch8203][ch8203](stealing elections, using justice as a political weapon against presidential candidates, trying to assassinate a presidential candidate, etc.)

Is it still responsible for them to be able to vote anonymously? It would be better if we registered that people voted for the left.
That would save a lot of work when Trump is king. :D

Title: Re: No "WARRANT" needed for masks
Post by Eegore on 06/18/25 at 07:34:01

I understand the point about masked law-enforcement and why it’s not ideal. But I also understand the violent tendencies of the left where policeman would be identified and targeted later so I get their point of view also.

I agree. The real problem is, as usual, the politics. If Biden had masked LEO going after Jan 6th humans present at the US Capital then CA wouldn't even be considering this law.

I pulled up some data in regard to our civilian protection programs (self defense) and 14% of humans signing up are family of Correctional or Local LEO stating they are taking a course in response to stalking/threats etc. from LEO staff doing their job.

There's not a 14% accusation rate for violations of rights or criminal actions in these employment categories. Not even on social media. Its about .8% This indicates that the overwhelming majority of LEO family members that are stalked or threatened simply because they are family of LEO doing their job correctly. Also the speed is telling as some family are getting threats during the actual traffic stop etc.

Masks have validity for LEO in certain situations. There is no requirement, anywhere, for a WARRANT on order to wear one. I do beleive that there should be very impactful punishment for mask abuse by LEO. Even one's Trump isn't using. The financial impact should not be from any tax fund.

Title: Re: No "WARRANT" needed for masks
Post by Needles on 06/18/25 at 13:58:13

So far, only MAGATs have actually harmed or killed anyone because of their office in politics.

Title: Re: No "WARRANT" needed for masks
Post by Eegore on 06/18/25 at 14:02:49

So far, only MAGATs have actually harmed or killed anyone because of their office in politics.

I find it hard to believe no other politician before Trump has harmed or killed anyone.

Title: Re: No "WARRANT" needed for masks
Post by Needles on 06/18/25 at 14:26:02

MAGATs HATE "liberals", Democrats, brown skinned people, white people that disagree with them, women, the poor, working people, science, math, due process, free speech, Ukraine, Hollywood, and California in general. This list is not comprehensive, and is in no particular order.

Democrats don't seem to hate anything except MAGA injustices and lies.

Title: Re: No "WARRANT" needed for masks
Post by zevenenergie on 06/19/25 at 03:36:01

http://https://i.imgur.com/I3kbw0im.jpg