Common Sense batted .500 yesterday.

Obviously, boys and men can't play in a competitive girls and women's sports league. The fact this wasn't unanimous is not a surprise, but a sign of the times.

On birthright citizenship, it was easy to agree with it in the past when it was essentially an academic exercise. Agreeing with the decision yesterday is still academic for a few, but for the vast majority of others, it's another symptom of TDS. There's simply no other explanation to say it makes sense to be virtually unique in the world and declare a child born of a woman in the country illegally, is immediately a citizen for life.

I can't see a constitutional amendment ever happening. In fact, I have a hard time imagining an amendment passing on any topic. However, from what I've read briefly, the Brett Kavagnugh dissent gives a roadmap to bring this up again during a Vance Presidency.

"... On birthright citizenship, ..."

So it is the same.
ILLEGAL Women,
who are days away from birth,
can SNEAK into this nation, give birth, then stay for 18 years.

Then prompting the male,
  to SNEAK into this country,
     work for cash,      
       and pay no taxes.

Then for 18 years the female
         AND MALE,
gets FREE STUFF, cause she has to care for the child.
And he is Hiding cause he is ILEAGAL.

Yep, the SOCIALISTS prevailed on that one.

 I'm just glad there is another SCOTUS ruling clarifying "under the jurisdiction thereof".  

 Not that that poorly articulated argument will go away, but it makes it less viable in the minds of humans that use facts over rhetoric.

 So Pew research is valid now but not when it researches covid numbers.

And someone says,'
should be, with,
you rise up on your horse.


 It just doesn't make sense to me to say sources aren't accurate and can't be trusted, then use those exact same sources as evidence.

 If Pew Research consistently fabricated pandemic information, then they fabricated this information.

Don't believe they "fabricated".

   It was/is, a lack of :
"The Rest Of The Story"


 Ok, that makes more sense.

Serowbot wrote on 07/02/26 at 08:29:56:


"... many countries in Europe, Asia, and Africa require at least one parent to be a citizen or legal resident...."

"... 50 or so countries have more limited variations of birthright citizenship. ..."

"... U.S.-style birthright citizenship is uncommon around the world..."



        A few MORE, Restricted Countries
      India      
     China      
     Indonesia      
     Japan      
     Iran      
     Germany      
     Thailand      
     United Kingdom      Restricted      
     France      
     South Africa      
     Italy      
     Colombia      
     Sudan      
     Spain      
     Ukraine      
     Morocco      
     Malaysia      
     Australia      
     Taiwan      
     Netherlands      
     Cambodia      
     Tunisia      
     Belgium      
     Dominican Republic      
     Sweden      
     Azerbaijan      
     Portugal      
     Greece      
     Israel      
     Hong Kong      
(Complicated compatibilities with mainland China)
     Singapore      
     Finland      
     Ireland      
     Mongolia      
     Namibia      
     Latvia      
     Bahrain      
     Cyprus      
     Macau      
     Luxembourg      
     Malta      
     Sao Tome and Principe      
     American Samoa      

"Birthright citizenship is actually only valid when the mother is here legally, and subject, to the laws thereof."

 So the child will not have birthright citizenship if the mother entered illegally?  

 My research indicates many, many mothers that are in the US illegally have children that are given birthright citizenship.  Humans in the US illegally are subject to the jurisdiction of US law - which is why it is called illegal immigration.