SuzukiSavage.com

Eegore Serious Thumper Offline SuzukiSavage.com Rocks! Posts: 10290	Re: 3 times Reply #45 - Today at 13:34:47 He can’t and he won’t. He’s a clown. It's highly unlikely he will follow the research and verification guidelines he demands of others. Of course it will be someone else's fault, not his.
Back to top	IP Logged

Needles

Serious Thumper

Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 1799
AR
Gender: male

Re: 3 times
Reply #46 - Today at 14:04:34

I'll give you a chance. YOU show ME ANY photo of a hole in his ear. ANY photo after the staged shooting will be fine, as they all show his supposedly "shot" ear intact. Even the "fact check" sites that supposedly show the bullet flying past are BS. First, what in h3ll was a NY Times photographer doing with the technical setup needed to actually photograph a bullet? To do that, the camera has to be synced to the firearm. Catching a random bullet with a random photo would be the height of unlikely coincidence.
Like the coincidence of a mentally impaired kid finding the hole in the Secret Service security.
Like the coincidence of Trumpedo turning his head at the exact moment necessary for him to avoid a head shot.
If you look at the claimed photo evidence, which is NOT shown on the fact check sites, with magnification, you can see the disruption "swirls" at both ends of the so-called "bullet". If anything, there should be a flat waveform at the front, nearly impossible to catch in a photo, and the disruption "swirls" should be at the rear.
Also, the trajectory is not compatible with that bullet hitting the TOP of the ear. It's at the level of his earlobe and neck, so the "bullet" in the photo did not hit his ear.

A LOT of coincidences simultaneously; the photo proves nothing; no damage to his ear. He lied. The only "experts" that have certified the shooting were his own sycophants.

Back to top

IP Logged

WebsterMark

Serious Thumper

Online

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 14757

Gender: male

Re: 3 times
Reply #47 - Today at 15:31:53

Knowing how fxxksticks like you are, you will do your stupid act and pretend you know what the Fxxk you’re talking about. Go on YouTube and search for Doug Mills and hear from the photographer himself.

And yes, you can see Trump’s ear. There’s no hole in it but it’s bleeding. Have you never bled heavily from a minor cut cut because I have.

Yes, it was a fluke, it was incredibly lucky. There are other pictures of photographers getting lucky and photographing the same thing. It happens.

But, regardless, there is a man behind Trump, who was killed. So shut your stupid retarded mouth you useless Fxxk.

Back to top

IP Logged

Serowbot YaBB Moderator ModSquad Offline OK.... so what's the speed of dark? Posts: 29759 Tucson Az Gender:	Re: 3 times Reply #48 - Today at 15:51:50 WebsterMark wrote on Today at 15:31:53: But, regardless, there is a man behind Trump, who was killed. So shut your stupid retarded mouth you useless Fxxk. Can you bring it down a notch? It doesn't help your argument
Back to top	Ludicrous Speed !... ... ... IP Logged

Eegore

Serious Thumper

Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 10290

Re: 3 times
Reply #49 - Today at 16:24:44

First, what in h3ll was a NY Times photographer doing with the technical setup needed to actually photograph a bullet? To do that, the camera has to be synced to the firearm.

This is not true in any way.

Catching a random bullet with a random photo would be the height of unlikely coincidence.

This is true.

Also, the trajectory is not compatible with that bullet hitting the TOP of the ear. It's at the level of his earlobe and neck, so the "bullet" in the photo did not hit his ear.

This is not true. When another member attempted to claim that the entire planet besides him had an "oopsies" and couldn't do the bullet trajectory correctly we ran a series of very specific, scale trajectory analysis from various locations across the globe.

https://suzukisavage.com/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1721526573/15

Back to top

IP Logged

Eegore Serious Thumper Offline SuzukiSavage.com Rocks! Posts: 10290	Re: 3 times Reply #50 - Today at 16:25:28 Can you bring it down a notch? It doesn't help your argument Does repeatedly calling members pedophiles help?
Back to top	IP Logged

Serowbot YaBB Moderator ModSquad Offline OK.... so what's the speed of dark? Posts: 29759 Tucson Az Gender:	Re: 3 times Reply #51 - Today at 16:27:46 I call the man they support a pedophile
Back to top	Ludicrous Speed !... ... ... IP Logged

Eegore Serious Thumper Offline SuzukiSavage.com Rocks! Posts: 10290	Re: 3 times Reply #52 - Today at 17:00:37 I call the man they support a pedophile Ok. When a forum member repeatedly calls other forum members pedophiles, does that help their argument? Would it be a situation where they would be asked to bring it down a notch? Or is this just a "stupid retarded mouth you useless Fxxk." type of situation?
Back to top	IP Logged

WebsterMark Serious Thumper Online SuzukiSavage.com Rocks! Posts: 14757 Gender:	Re: 3 times Reply #53 - Today at 17:17:38 Serowbot wrote on Today at 15:51:50: WebsterMark wrote on Today at 15:31:53: But, regardless, there is a man behind Trump, who was killed. So shut your stupid retarded mouth you useless Fxxk. Can you bring it down a notch? It doesn't help your argument No.
Back to top	IP Logged

WebsterMark Serious Thumper Online SuzukiSavage.com Rocks! Posts: 14757 Gender:	Re: 3 times Reply #54 - Today at 17:22:21 Serowbot wrote on Today at 16:27:46: I call the man they support a pedophile Look, that d!ckwad posts with impunity and and you don’t do $hit so I decided to hell with it. I’m calling a spade a spade and that retard is flipping you over and ramming it up your moderator’s a$$ so if all bets are off then fine, they’re off.
Back to top	IP Logged