I'll give you a chance. YOU show ME ANY photo of a hole in his ear. ANY photo after the staged shooting will be fine, as they all show his supposedly "shot" ear intact. Even the "fact check" sites that supposedly show the bullet flying past are BS. First, what in h3ll was a NY Times photographer doing with the technical setup needed to actually photograph a bullet? To do that, the camera has to be synced to the firearm. Catching a random bullet with a random photo would be the height of unlikely coincidence.
Like the coincidence of a mentally impaired kid finding the hole in the Secret Service security.
Like the coincidence of Trumpedo turning his head at the exact moment necessary for him to avoid a head shot.
If you look at the claimed photo evidence, which is NOT shown on the fact check sites, with magnification, you can see the disruption "swirls" at both ends of the so-called "bullet". If anything, there should be a flat waveform at the front, nearly impossible to catch in a photo, and the disruption "swirls" should be at the rear.
Also, the trajectory is not compatible with that bullet hitting the TOP of the ear.  It's at the level of his earlobe and neck, so the "bullet" in the photo did not hit his ear.

A LOT of coincidences simultaneously; the photo proves nothing; no damage to his ear. He lied. The only "experts" that have certified the shooting were his own sycophants.