Or adjust the coverage you consume.

"...  today’s shooting in Minneapolis ..."

 Has turned into the BIGGEST EVER,

 " Hey LOOK OVER THERE !!! "

By the UL, DFI, WOKE, FDS SOCIALISTS !



 

Needles wrote on 01/08/26 at 14:39:18:


So was Ashley Babbitt.

Needles wrote on Yesterday at 06:34:08:


OK. GOOD.
Trying to run someone over,
with a motor car,
is NOT a crime !

Good to know !

If two people break into a house, and a cop kills one, the other is at least charged with manslaughter,

 This is an opinion.  My post is an opinion.

 The previous two sentences indicate two opinions exist within this post.

 I disagree.  My opinion is that I disagree.  There are many, many criminal invasion cases where the co-conspirators are not charged with manslaughter.  It can happen but is not typical.  This is an opinion based off an assessment of thousands of criminal home-invasion cases.

The difference is that he Jan 6 TRAITORS were given trials and convicted, unless they confessed. Good was not given due process, and, NO, she did not try to hit the officer with her vehicle. She was trying to escape DEATH, you sycophantic cretins. Eyewitnesses say the ICE "Officer" yelled at her to move her vehicle, and when she did, the murderous bastard shot her, then, approached and shot her twice more. THEN they refused to let a doctor who was present treat her, as well as delaying the EMTs who showed up for at least 15 minutes. That fool is as guilty as Derek Chauvin.

The difference is that he Jan 6 TRAITORS were given trials and convicted, unless they confessed. Good was not given due process, and, NO, she did not try to hit the officer with her vehicle. She was trying to escape DEATH, you sycophantic cretins.


 Webstermark presents a direct comparison to Babbitt an no other known human.  No other Jan 6th human applies to a direct comparison of two very specific humans.  

 Babbitt also was not given due process.  No other trial(s) at any time in any place applies to Webstermark's comparison of Babbitt and Good, and only them with the exclusion of all other known humans.


 This post is an opinion.

 It does appear she was following the statement of her wife telling her to drive away - which is corroborated with the video of her wife saying it was her (the wife's) fault.  Basically a state of grief because her wife drove away when she said to, or implied, and ended up dead.  

 I believe they were intending to escape an order to get out of a vehicle and be forced to interact with ICE.  Their demeanor and very specific statement saying they would "be around later" is not something I would expect a human escaping DEATH would say.  

 Facts won't mater here.  My opinion is facts won't matter here.  The previous sentence indicated an opinion.

 If you like Trump then ICE does nothing wrong.  The ICE agent was escaping DEATH.

 If you do not like Trump, ICE murders everyone all the time.  Good was escaping DEATH.

 This post is an opinion.