No way in hell was that case a President who was charged with Treason. It's never happened before, so there is NO PRECEDENT. The standards for elected officials are a good bit higher than for someone off the street; the US President MUST be held to a higher standard, though MAGATs have allowed them to dip into pig sty levels.

 The process for TREASON! is specifically outlined.  You claim there is a whole process that simply does not exist.  The difference is I will acknowledge that the current system is flawed, and you make up lies claiming it currently works a different way.



And, we don't need an Amendment to override the SC. All they have to do is pass the law as "not reviewable" and set new Treason standards.

 I never said we did.  I said we need amendments to the US Constitution.  Treason is in the US Constitution, and that does require Amendments.  You can't possibly be serious here.  You really do not understand that "not reviewable" is a SCOTUS process and Article V is the only allowed process for altering the US Constitution?  


Oh, and you might want to look up Roe v Wade in reference to reversing SC decisions...

 So this answers my previous question.  You clearly do not know that SCOTUS decisions can not alter the Constitution.  It can interpret it, and as such decisions like Roe v Wade can be changed without Amendment.  

 Or, you are simply tossing out more lies hoping someone actually believes "not reviewable" is a process that allows the SCOTUS of all things to change the US Constitution.

 TREASON! is deliberately established with the specific definition in the Constitution to prevent the abuse of treason charges for political purposes.  Which is pretty obvious thats exactly what you want to do.  


https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/constitution/article-v.html
 

You're not capable of outside-the-conservative-bubble thinking.

 Predictable response, no reference to refute mine, just more nonsensical political deflection to avoid actual facts.  Can't provide your own empirical evidence so you have to resort to political ideation.



The Nazis didn't break any laws, either. They just made what they wanted legal.

 You mean like taking a social media post and insisting it is actual law?  Or saying there is no PRECEDENT so we can ignore the US Constitution?  Sound familiar?



Trump and his minions violate the Constitution daily, then try to hide behind it, using their paid-for SCOTUS "Justices" to justify their treason.

 You mean like saying the SCOTUS can change the US Constitution?  Sound familiar at all?



And YES, anyone with at least two brain cells can tell it's treason, no matter what excuses you make for them. After the Dems take over, they'll have enough to amend the Constitution...

 Except if it was TREASON! they wouldn't have to amend the Constitution.  The problem is your inability to educate yourself or accept what TREASON! defined by Article III, Section 3 is.


You just want TREASON! so bad you won't even consider any other crime that is actually being committed.  Also you do such a poor job at making this argument nobody can take you seriously.  Just pick the correct crime.

 Or better yet, provide, with references, a legal expert breakdown stating how Trump funding US Citizens is TREASON and settle the argument.  Follow your own standards that you demand of others.