Donate!
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register :: View Members
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
TP (Read 86 times)
MnSpring
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

Younger than most
people my age.

Posts: 10436
Minn
Gender: male
TP
10/31/25 at 19:31:01
 
“… Toilet papering, often perceived as a benign prank, can violate trespass and vandalism laws. Trespass laws prohibit entering another person’s property without permission, which includes interfering with the property owner’s use and enjoyment of their land. Toilet papering may breach these laws by stepping onto private property without consent.
Vandalism laws add further legal complications. Vandalism involves the willful destruction or defacement of property, and while toilet papering might not cause permanent harm, it can still be classified as vandalism. Many states define vandalism broadly, including acts that temporarily alter a property’s appearance without the owner’s permission, such as this prank. …”


Been the norm for a very long time.

    Yet This One,
From the Land of the Fairy Dust Sprinkling
      Socialists

    JUST WOW

“… If you toilet paper a house in California, you can be charged with malicious damage to property, destruction of another person's property, or defacing another person's property…”
Back to top
 
 

Ben Franklin once said: "If you give up a freedom, for the sake of security, you will have neither".
Which is More TRUE, today, than yesterday.('06, S-40, Stock) well, mostly .
  IP Logged
Needles
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 915
AR
Gender: male
Re: TP
Reply #1 - 11/01/25 at 06:18:37
 
Appropriate laws do not have party affiliations.



Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Eegore
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 9756

Re: TP
Reply #2 - 11/01/25 at 12:45:05
 

 In all 50 States a human can be "charged with malicious damage to property, destruction of another person's property, or defacing another person's property"

 What makes Toilet Paper and CA any different than all other States?  I see nothing in CA law that is more punitive than other States.

 A list of States where "If you toilet paper a house you can be charged with malicious damage to property, destruction of another person's property, or defacing another person's property"

Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
MnSpring
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

Younger than most
people my age.

Posts: 10436
Minn
Gender: male
Re: TP
Reply #3 - 11/01/25 at 15:19:18
 
Eegore wrote on 11/01/25 at 12:45:05:
"...   I see nothing in CA law that is more punitive than other States.  ..."


Owning/buying a gun is just one !


Back to top
 
 

Ben Franklin once said: "If you give up a freedom, for the sake of security, you will have neither".
Which is More TRUE, today, than yesterday.('06, S-40, Stock) well, mostly .
  IP Logged
Eegore
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 9756

Re: TP
Reply #4 - 11/01/25 at 16:11:33
 
Owning/buying a gun is just one !

 Nice Spin.  Let's use the question proposed in it's entirety, in context to this post which is literally titled "TP", and not only edited section providing only one sentence:

 Lets clarify:

 What makes Toilet Paper and CA any different than all other States?  I see nothing in CA law that is more punitive specific to Toilet Paper and only the words "Toilet" and "Paper" in specific sequential format of "Toilet" proceeding "Paper" in context to the item "Toilet Paper", exclusive to all other known objects, only and exclusively "Toilet Paper", not guns, or any other known object - only "Toilet Paper" - than other States.

 Nothing about CA and TPing a house is different than other States according to law.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
MnSpring
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

Younger than most
people my age.

Posts: 10436
Minn
Gender: male
Re: TP
Reply #5 - 11/01/25 at 17:09:20
 
"...   Nice Spin.  ..."

Thanks, but it was not a spin.

I quoted you saying: "... I see nothing in CA law that is more punitive than other States..."

I responded to that, stating CA Law, considering guns Is Different.

You said, (after):
...I see nothing in CA law that is more punitive than other States....

You did not say:
...Nothing about CA and TPing a house is different than other States according to law. ...

Not a spin, a fact.

Anyway their is one place, city, where the Police ENGAGE themselves, and some stores actually set out roles, for people to use. And the 'kids' sell "insurance' to people that will buy it.

Don't know where, don't care.

(Perhaps is somewhere in CA)






Back to top
 
 

Ben Franklin once said: "If you give up a freedom, for the sake of security, you will have neither".
Which is More TRUE, today, than yesterday.('06, S-40, Stock) well, mostly .
  IP Logged
Eegore
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 9756

Re: TP
Reply #6 - 11/01/25 at 20:16:08
 

I quoted you saying: "... I see nothing in CA law that is more punitive than other States..."


 Ok.  I was not clear that I did not mean literally all other things than the topic of the thread titled "TP" that is about "Toilet Paper".  To clarify, I was addressing toilet paper and not all other things.

 There is nothing about CA law, specific to toilet paper, that is more punitive than any other State.  Nothing about the words used in this post,  to be clear: This means an exemption of all other words on all other subjects in any location other than this specific post, indicates that CA law is more punitive.

 So it is equally accurate to say this:

JUST WOW

“… If you toilet paper a house in any US State, you can be charged with malicious damage to property, destruction of another person's property, or defacing another person's property…”


Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
MnSpring
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

Younger than most
people my age.

Posts: 10436
Minn
Gender: male
Re: TP
Reply #7 - 11/02/25 at 05:34:24
 
Back to top
 
 

Ben Franklin once said: "If you give up a freedom, for the sake of security, you will have neither".
Which is More TRUE, today, than yesterday.('06, S-40, Stock) well, mostly .
  IP Logged
Eegore
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 9756

Re: TP
Reply #8 - 11/02/25 at 07:09:01
 

Would be technically wrong.

 I disagree.  Nothing about your links exempts toilet paper from vandalism laws.  You can be charged in Alabama for vandalism while using the medium of toilet paper no matter how many Police Departments choose not to press charges.  This is like saying a local Police Department raced some high school kids on a back county road so people are "technically wrong" to say speed limits exist in all 50 States.

 Alabama cities charge humans for vandalism, and while engaging in a non-approved toilet papering of a home if one meets the legal standard of Alabama law they can be charged with malicious damage to property, destruction of another person's property, or defacing another person's property.

 Just like all other States.  

 Singling out CA makes no sense.  Humans can be charged with vandalism in all 50 States - nothing about your articles provides exemption to that.
Back to top
 
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 07:12:11 by Eegore »  
  IP Logged
Needles
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 915
AR
Gender: male
Re: TP
Reply #9 - Yesterday at 06:07:26
 
Property crimes are only adjudicated if the victim(s) press charges. You can sue a teenager, but what do you think you'll get?



Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
thumperclone
Serious Thumper
Alliance Member
*****
Offline

PGR rider  riding
with respect

Posts: 7209
Grand Junction Colorado
Gender: male
Re: TP
Reply #10 - Yesterday at 07:42:37
 
so now we are discussing a$$ wipe in a topic started by our resident 5th grader
Back to top
 
 

standing for those who stood for US
















  IP Logged
Eegore
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 9756

Re: TP
Reply #11 - Yesterday at 10:52:33
 

so now we are discussing a$$ wipe in a topic started by our resident 5th grader

 Kind of a 4th grade response to call it "@SS wipe" and not contribute anything useful.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Needles
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 915
AR
Gender: male
Re: TP
Reply #12 - Yesterday at 13:55:59
 
Eegore wrote on Yesterday at 10:52:33:
so now we are discussing a$$ wipe in a topic started by our resident 5th grader

 Kind of a 4th grade response to call it "@SS wipe" and not contribute anything useful.



You think the purpose of this thread is to be useful?




Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
thumperclone
Serious Thumper
Alliance Member
*****
Offline

PGR rider  riding
with respect

Posts: 7209
Grand Junction Colorado
Gender: male
Re: TP
Reply #13 - Yesterday at 13:57:09
 
THIS THREAD STINKS! Cheesy
Back to top
 
 

standing for those who stood for US
















  IP Logged
Eegore
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 9756

Re: TP
Reply #14 - Yesterday at 14:17:21
 

You think the purpose of this thread is to be useful?

 No.  I think contributions can be useful.  This forum is not actual discussions, it is complaining with internet links.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print


« Home

 
« Home
SuzukiSavage.com
11/04/25 at 01:57:39



General CategoryPolitics, Religion (Tall Table) › TP


SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2!
YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved.