Using the 6 Sigma rule, ALL incidents of voter fraud are statistically Republicans.

 Not true.  Six Sigma is a methodology aiming for extremely near-perfection, thus allowing for just 3.4 defects per million opportunities, which translates to a 99.99966% yield, not 100%.  Never 100%, thus not "ALL" by definition.  Its for reducing defects and returning a "virtual" 100% no-defect yield.   The historical case load is closer to 5Sig.

 Republicans statistically have higher court cases for election fraud, but there is no reason to use 6 Sigma to calculate this.  They for sure meet a high Sig level, but nobody is going to say 100% as  a flat statistical value.

 Also you never stated you are using 6 Sigma as a parameter so it should not be expected that anyone would assume this.  
 


I never said there was no corruption on the Dem side. Sure, there are corrupt Dems. The difference is when the Dems catch them, they're ostracized; when the MAGATs catch them, they get Cabinet seats.


 You did say not one Democrat or Independent exists in a legitimate voter fraud case: "EVERY legitimate case of voter fraud has been a GOP voter. NOT some--- EVERY one."  

 That means 100%.  EVERY means not one legitimate case involved a Democrat.  Not a single one.  This is sh!t you made up, and now you are trying to skirt around that definitive statement by claiming 6 Sigma would eliminate to a value of 0%, or "ALL".

 If I say EVERY pill in the barrel is Red.  Not SOME --- EVERY one is Red.  Then there is 1 blue out of 3.4 Million pills, nobody is going to say "ALL" pills are Red even if we use 6 Sigma to calculate that.  They will say my statement was wrong, not EVERY pill is Red.  Its that simple.

"Legitimate", as in, not an elderly Dem lady who didn't know she was not allowed to vote again because she moved. "Legitimate", because, statistically, there has NEVER been a Dem case that would have changed the election outcomes. "Legitimate", because NO DEM leader has even TOLD a Governor, "Just find me 11,xxx votes."

Just accept the fact that voter fraud is FORBIDDEN, but MAGATs use it as a technique to win elections, just like they use gerrymandering to make it look like they are a viable party that would have disappeared if gerrymandering was outlawed, since it's just another way to defraud voters. You've lost this one, no matter how many nits you pick nor hairs you split.

You lose.

Again.

Needles wrote on Yesterday at 14:37:24:


WOW !

That is very good,
Best LAUGH in a long time !!!!!!!