I'm not a lawyer. YOU claim to be. Eyore, you're lying.

I regularly visit a site with a lot of left-leaning people, and they tell each other lies, sometimes very sophisticated ones. It's quite worrying when you see how this is structured. They applaud each other for it and agree with each other. In this way, they inflame each other, keep each other emotional, and have started to believe in their lies.

And of course, they also want to be taken seriously outside their own sene. But they can't engage in a real discussion because the lies are easily visible to an outsider. So, subconsciously, they avoid a real discussion.
When they do engage in a real discussion, for example, with Charlie Kirk, the lies become visible through exposure.

I think exposure and confrontation are two incredibly beneficial tools.

Eegore wrote on 10/16/25 at 16:55:15:


So, if you're NOT a lawyer, and I'm not a lawyer, our opinions have the same weight. You keep harping on me saying I lie sometimes. Hey, I was just trying to fit in. Your whole cult worships a constant liar. That means YOU support lying in general, and his lies in particular. Your only real beef is that WHEN I "lie", My lies don't agree with your lies that you are trying to live by. 47's lies are what stops you from interpreting the laws adequately, even though YOUR opinion bears no more weight than mine. So, mainly, you're just a MAGAT poser, trying, like all MAGATs, to sound like you know what you're talking about.

So, if you're NOT a lawyer, and I'm not a lawyer, our opinions have the same weight.

 I agree.  However the person who references actual existing US law has a more accurate assessment than the person who imagines up fake laws that do not exist.

 
You keep harping on me saying I lie sometimes. Hey, I was just trying to fit in.

 It doesn't look like anybody believes that.  It appears more like you lie hoping people believe you.  The whole "I lied on purpose" is a common response from people caught lying.  In that regard you do fit in.  You also qualified your intentional duplicity when you stated that you would lie if you have to, not because you want to fit in.



Your whole cult worships a constant liar. That means YOU support lying in general, and his lies in particular. Your only real beef is that WHEN I "lie", My lies don't agree with your lies that you are trying to live by.

 Except I don't support Trump, you just assign that to anyone that does not completely agree with everything you say.  No different than Conservative members here that claim I support Biden/Harris when I show them that their lying social media post is a lie.  Refusing to accept false information is pro-truth, not pro-POTUS.

 If your interpretation of treason is correct, why hasn't a single charge been pressed against Trump?  That's the one thing the entire Democratic Party just decided to ignore?  Every single anti-Trump legal group in the country is assessing it wrong, but you are right, again using a social media post as the basis for your argument.

 I'm willing to have the discussion, because as I already said multiple times, that you refuse to Observe, Trump should be charged.  However, I cannot agree that laws you made up, including processes like a separate Federal court, that does not exist, are how it would be done.  Your imagined Federal Court process is not real, that does not make me a Trump supporter - but it does make you a liar.  

 

Coming from another MAGAT supporting the ersatz lawyer.  

Eegore, it’s like you’re talking to a bratty and annoying kindergartner who makes up stuff constantly.

Are you trying to earn favor with the gods or something?

By the way, Eyore, the Ersatz Lawyer, No one had filed charges because 47 has a bought-and-paid-for DOJ with a clueless blonde bimbo in charge, and a kangaroo Supreme Court packed with sycophants. REAL lawyers would know they would be wasting their time. Just wait until the sh*tshow is over, and watch who goes to jail.

 I can see the logic of not filing charges, but why isn't anyone articulating the process?  I mean real legal groups, not podcasts and social media posts - actual lawyers.  The treason argument is like the Covid vaccine deaths arguments, nobody used actual epidemiologists/medical professionals as their references, they used Joe Rogan and Alex Jones.  So obviously the vaccine killed millions of people, Facebook said so.

 Your answer to this is to make childish insults, and make up illegal procedures that do not exist, justifying this illogical stance by saying you want to fit in.  Nobody is going to think I claimed to be a lawyer, this type of amateur tactic is a weak attempt at avoiding a real discussion.  As long as you deflect, you won't have to face the fact some of your information is wrong.