JOG wrote on 09/02/25 at 18:41:23:


Go To this ULR,
and READ IT !!!

Here are just some highlights.

(Oh, neadealbeatel, I am sure Bot will read this to you)
     LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

“… 30,000 gun related deaths per year by firearms, …
65% of those deaths are by suicide which would never be prevented by gun laws …
15% are by law enforcement in the line of duty and justified …
17% are through criminal activity, gang and drug related or mentally ill …

“… “gun violence” is not 30,000 annually, but drops to 5,100. …
U.S. population 324,000,000

“… 40,000+ die from a drug overdose …
36,000 people die per year from the flu, …
34,000 people die per year in traffic fatalities …

“… 200,000+ people die each year (and growing) from preventable medical errors. You are safer in Chicago than when you are in a hospital!

“… 710,000 people die per year from heart disease. It s time to stop the double cheeseburgers! So what is the point? If Obama and the anti-gun movement focused their attention on heart disease, even a 10% decrease in cardiac deaths would save twice the number of lives annually of all gun-related deaths ..,,.’

YOUR "perspective" is the view from 47's a$$hole.

You USE observed reality every day.

You USE observed reality every day.

 Agreed.  I do not however use it as a qualifying factor for data or reference.  Data can conflict with my Observed Reality and be correct.

 You decide if information (that you typically won't even read) is correct based off your Observed Reality.   This is why you think the Covid vaccine killed tons of kids and don't think twice about repeatedly defending information that says millions and millions died from it.

 Your defense is you have seen two kids die on "LIVE TV".  So using that same logic, if a human sees two people get killed by an active shooter on "LIVE TV" then their Observed Reality supersedes all the gun death statistics you presented here.  

 They are doing with guns, literally the exact same thing you do with youth vaccination deaths.  Taking personal Observations and claiming all other numbers that do not coincide with the personal Observations, are wrong.  Try some perspective.

I've made 70 years watching the World using my thinking. You may not agree with it, but I've been one of those Laughable Conspiracy Theorists who were eventually vindicated a buncha times.

 Great.  If you want to know why anti-gun humans won't Try some Perspective, it is because they are doing exactly what you are.  Just on a different topic.  They Observe gun crime and ignore numbers of legal gun ownership just like you Observe claims of dead kids and ignore numbers of living children.  


 Maybe you will eventually be vindicated and all those kids you argued, repeatedly, are "D.E.A.D." won't actually be alive today.  

Bullschitt
I've made changes when data justified it

 I agree.  You just won't Observe data that conflicts with what you already decided was true.  If you do not Observe child mortality pre-vaccine for instance, because "it doesn't matter" then data can never say vaccines didn't kill millions of kids in your Reality.  

 Sort of how anti-gun won't look at gun control vs non-gun control areas.  By not Observing the data, they create an Observed Reality where gun control works.  All they have to say is data pre-gun control law "doesn't matter" after all they saw a few people die on "LIVE TV" so that there proves all data saying that gun control doesn't work is wrong.

 Are you going to tell them they didn't see two people killed by a gun on "LIVE TV"?