Eegore
Serious Thumper
   
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com Rocks!
Posts: 9380
|
So Demanding a rancher, pay 16 MILLION, for building a Wild Life Pond, is the same ?
No. I never said that, I said the opposite of that. It's different. Not the same. Different than the river incident. It is different than the river incident, so using the river incident makes little sense. That's because it is not the same, it is different.
And it cost HIM a bunch of money, to NOT pay 16M, is irrelevant, concerning administrative overreach ?
I never said that. I said using the river incident as part of an argument for this is like saying a that if a human that works for the DMV has a kid that wrecks a car causing millions in damage to farmers, the DMV loses the authority to issue and revoke Driver licenses. When the real issue is the DMV saying you can't drive a vehicle on your private land. The real issue is them trying to control your private land.
EPA has, AGAIN, discovered, that they can not do what ever they want to do, just because they believe they are outstandingly superior to anyone else.
After the Durango incident the EPA assisted CO in creating more avenues for them to legally pay restitution. The limitation is in US law and does not apply specifically to the EPA. Of course the massive lack of accountability certainly impacts their decision making.
|