EVERY single court has not ruled on the mask issue. I didn't say EVERY single court. I said every single court
ruling. In context, specifically to masks. I am not claiming every single court ruling on the planet is about masks.
I would be happy to look over any reference you have that indicates LEO can not wear masks and require a "WARRANT". Until then I will go with the multitude of references I will provide while you provide zero references.
https://www.nbcboston.com/news/local/knowing-your-rights-what-are-ice-agents-...federal officers can cover their faces, but according to federal law, they should carry with something that identifies them and the agency they're with. How they display that often falls on agency policy.https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2025/0611/ice-agents-masks-protestshttps://www.cnn.com/2025/04/08/us/ice-masks-federal-agents-arrest-studentsThere is no federal policy dictating when officers can or should cover their faces during arrests, but historically they have almost always worn them only while performing undercover work to protect the integrity of ongoing investigations, law enforcement experts told CNN. There is no information, unless you offer some, that requires a WARRANT for LEO to wear a mask.
There is NOTHING in US law that allows ANY agency to just disappera groups of people without going to court. NOTHING. I agree, and maybe if you used real laws and not made up nonsense like WARRANT requirements for masks, you could make a cohesive argument about this.
Here's an example with reference:
https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-8/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-287/section-...At the time of the arrest, the designated immigration officer shall,
as soon as it is practical and safe to do so: The underlined part is where ICE (which is LEO no matter what you claim) gets away with conducting arrests with masks on and not identifying themselves prior to making the arrest. I'm not sure how this could be altered and not give actual criminals leverage, but at least the requirement for ID does exist and is stated as such to be done quickly. This is faster than US citizens get in non-immigration arrests when you break down the timelines.
As for your argument about WARRANT, this is the actual law and not made up nonsense:
287.3 Disposition of cases of aliens arrested without warrant.
https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-8/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-287/section-... No mention of mask requirements. So you could theoretically make an argument about violations to 287.3, and have a
Valid Argument... or you can make up lies about mask and ID requirements.
Where did you IMAGINE you live? You obviously have NO IDEA what the US is all about. You ARE the people Americans are embarrassed about.
Yeah, me being honest and not making up lies about mask laws, and using multiple references of
actual US law to outline ICE violations instead of making up more lies is sooo embarrassing.
Pages: 1 
