chatting about military ops on an unsecure site optimizes the maladroit nature of the maga FELONS' staff

off topic sandbox echos

There is so much division and therefore no honesty with the emphasis on honor.
A word is no longer worth anything these days, that is why no one believes you when you have observed something but that is really not a good thing.

It is a phenomenon of the times. In the Vedas it is described how humanity would become in this period we are in now (kaliyuga)
And there it is described among other things that a word is no longer true. But many years ago giving your word was a binding agreement.
Giving your word was more than a promise but an expression of sincere connection and dedication for the rest of your life.

thumperclone wrote on Yesterday at 08:36:36:


I saw, 'idiots'
and immediately thought of the,
DFI FDS WOKE UL Socialists.

I have no idea who’s telling the truth. I read Goldberg‘s article and according to him, there were very specific plans in the text chain that he felt were so specific, it would’ve been dangerous for him to reveal, so he didn’t. That’s what he says anyway. All the other parties say a reporter was stupidly and foolishly added to this chain as a mistake but they were adamant that no “war plans“ were included.

On one hand, Goldberg is famous for lying about Trump. He hates him so bad it’s entirely believable he would’ve exaggerated the content of the text chain to make it look like Trump’s picks for key positions are in over their heads.

On the other hand, it’s entirely believable that a staffer inadvertently added Goldberg to this chain, and the group did not notice that, and they did in fact list very specific items.

Now, Goldberg says he’s not gonna release these now but maybe later, but didn’t clarify a time frame. It would seem to me if the government officials felt like they could forever destroy Goldberg by releasing enough of the text chain content to show Goldberg was exaggerating due to his case of TDS, that could  potentially destroy his career and they would do that in a heartbeat.

On the other hand, Goldberg could do the same, he could release enough and black out the really sensitive parts and demonstrate that he was right and they were lying when they said there was nothing sensitive in the text chain.

If the government officials were lying and they really did accidentally include a reporter on a semi secured text chain with very specific war plans that  could potentially jeopardize the mission and then lied about it, heads are gonna roll. If they did do that and didn’t lie about it, but came right out and just said yeah we made a mistake, the story would hang around while because the media hates Trump but ultimately it would die in a day or two. But if they lied, and there’s blood in the water, all the TDS infected journalist are going to be swarming.

WebsterMark wrote on Yesterday at 13:11:47:

ask the sandbox resident from minn

"... How the crappity smack did we go from somebody foolishly adding a reporter to a semi secured communication ring  ..."

It's the name of the thread. !
      idiots


 (Describes the, UL, FDS, WOKE, Socialistic DFI's)

I started my working career in the credit and collections field. I was a credit manager for a manufacturing company, and my boss told me something which has always stuck with me. The credit department and the sales department should always be enemies. Always. They should always fight, they should never want to go out after work, they should never be friends.
Why? Because they have different goals. They should each be striving for excellence the way it’s defined within their working parameter, and to do that requires conflict.

So it is with our two party system. The right and the left should always be at odds. it’s been said the right are the adults and the left are the children. That’s a good analogy because adults need to have common sense and keep things within boundaries but if we don’t let some other child’s ideas leak in from time to time, we’ll both go extinct. It’s a good system and it’s worked very well.

We’re doing fine.