Eegore
Serious Thumper
Offline
SuzukiSavage.com Rocks!
Posts: 9000
|
It's stupid. My opinion is that it is stupid. This is nothing more than another example of Trump not having an understanding of US law, and people over-reacting to anything Trump says. This is an opinion. The Constitution does not require pardons in writing. Legislation has been signed by autopen, digital signature and proxy for decades. This exact issue of mandated personal signatures was addressed on July 7 2005: https://www.justice.gov/file/494411/dl?inline It is my opinion that this exact issue was addressed on July 7 2005. We find that, pursuant to this understanding, a person may sign a document by directing that his signature be affixed to it by another. We then review opinions of the Attorney General and the Department of Justice and find the same understanding reflected in opinions addressing statutory signing requirements in a variety of contexts. Reading the constitutional text in light of this established legal understanding, we conclude that the President need not personally perform the physical act of affixing his signature to a bill to sign it within the meaning of Article I, Section 7. Remember those checks we got with Trump's signature? Guess he should declare those VOID, VACANT, AND OF NO FURTHER FORCE OR EFFECT so we can pay that back immediately. The Department’s opinions provide no basis for concluding that an instruction that does not amount to a delegation of presidential authority for purposes of section 301 should nonetheless be regarded as such a delegation for constitutional purposes, and, for the reasons explained above, see supra Part I.C, we believe it should not be so regarded. Rather, as we previously explained, so long as the President personally makes the decision to approve and sign a bill, “the principle that the President may not delegate to another person his authority to sign abill . . . means, for example, that if a White House aide were to sign his own name to a bill, that bill would not thereby become law. By contrast, the President’s directive to an aide to affix the President’s signature to a bill does not involve a delegation of authority.”Accordingly, we conclude that neither past practice nor previous opinions relating to the signing requirement of Article I, Section 7 foreclose reading that requirement in a manner that is consistent with the traditional common law understanding of “sign,” with Attorney General and Department of Justice opinions applying that understanding to statutory signing requirements, and with the settled interpretation of the related presentment and return provisions.For the foregoing reasons, we conclude that the President need not personally perform the physical act of affixing his signature to a bill he approves and decides to sign in order for the bill to become law. Rather, the President may sign a bill within the meaning of Article I, Section 7 by directing a subordinate to affix the President’s signature to such a bill, for example by autopen.
|
Pages: 1
