"... Slides are not expensive ..."

Especially when
Someone Else
Pays for them !!!!!

Nor does it just get Transported onto a piece of glass in a lab. Slides are not expensive. And to believe that a Scientist would risk contamination of a test by using slides that are not clean? Ojh,,shut it ..You work So Hard protecting the narrative.

 What are you even talking about?  Obviously you are going to argue, as usual, with someone that read the information for you.

 The information provided described the graphene slide not the vaccine sample.  Graphene is basically the alignment filter used on the electron microscope, it reduces the electron scattering - which is what the information provided by Zev, that he literally called "proof", is describing.  A component of an electron microscope.  That's not "proof."

 This is like having a description of the glass the microscope lens is made out of and trying to say that's "proof" that there is glass IN the vaccine.  How stupid do you think people are?

So much gaslighting.. Ffs..
It was On the slide

Wel,that is stupid
Now it's Part of the microscope.
Don't lie to me
You got punched in the mouth in the sandbox for pissin other kids off.


 It was ALWAYS part of the microscope - that's what I've been trying to tell you since day 1.  A slide is part of a microscope.  Is the seat Part of your motorcycle?  Can you use a microscope without a slide?  Sure, about as useful as a motorcycle with no seat.

 The "proof" of graphene IN ... IN the vaccine was a description of graphene on a slide.  You want to talk about gaslighting - you are trying to figure out a way to make a graphene slide be part of the vaccine even though the slide was manufactured years prior.  The graphene was on the slide, but of course you want to argue with the guy that read it for you.

 I told you since the first post that it was a description of graphene on a slide.  You chose to not read it and decide it was actually talking about the vaccine.

A SLIDE is Not a part of a microscope.
It's what the examined article is Placed upon, then placed on the foot of the microscope, to be VIEWED.
You think I've never Used a microscope?
Slides are purchased in packages.


 Ok so what part of that means it is IN the vaccine?

 How does a graphene slide, used in conjunction with, a microscope provide "Proof" that graphene is IN the vaccine?  I've been trying to tell you since day 1 that the circled "proof" was describing the slide.
 

https://www.amazon.com/s?k=motorcycle+seat&crid=Y7AWSWNS7KYK&sprefix=motorcyc...

Nope..
Read what I said.
PissOff

 
 What you said doesn't address the "proof", you are ignoring that it was the description of a slide, so your Observed Reality can be that it somehow ended up IN the vaccine.

 Not possible, the graphene was on the slide years before, and the "proof" wasn't even describing the vaccine, it was describing equipment.

 For that matter, no I do not think you've ever used an electron microscope or know how graphene slides work in them.  The slide never even touches the sample.  And you complain when other people argue about things they know nothing about.  I imagine that won't be Observed either.

 So as long as you do not Observe the documentation, Observe how electron microscopes work or Observe time and space as we know it, then the graphene somehow ended up IN the vaccine.

A microscope SLIDE holds the sample.
Been that way for decades.
If you need the Definition of the word
Slide
To change
I'm not interested.

 That's not even remotely true.  There are varying degrees of "SLIDEs", and on an Electron microscope a graphene slide is essentially a filter placed between the sample SLIDE and the electron dispersal unit.  This is called using an electron transparent support.  You have a layer of sample slide between the graphene filter SLIDE.

 Of course you will refuse to Observe this so you can maintain the graphene IN the vaccine reality.  The only way to maintain this stance it to intentionally remain ignorant to how an electron microscope uses slide filters.

 All those SCIENTISTs using electron microscopes can't know more then you right?  I asked one today:


When used in an electron microscope, a graphene slide does not physically "touch" the sample, due to its single-atom thickness, graphene acts as a nearly transparent support layer allowing the electron beam to pass through it. There would be no value in a sample and a graphene slide being in contact and yes both devices are known as slides.

So here is a question.

Why are, all the NOVID's,
(people who never got the jab)
NOT, being asked for a blood sample ?

A Significant number of humans never got COVID or any of the jabs.
That blood could hold some valuable information which could help in determining what to do in the future.

Yet;
No Doctors office has requested it.
No clinical trial entities has requested it.
No CVA/Walgreens/etc has said come in for a blood draw.
No 'media' outlets have promoted it.

Sure does look like, a 'cure', is not what the goal is.

Why are, all the NOVID's,
(people who never got the jab)
NOT, being asked for a blood sample ?

 They are.  I have provided multiple after being asked.


Yet;
No Doctors office has requested it.

 Incorrect, mine has, all primary providers in the SCFM network request it.


No clinical trial entities has requested it.

 Incorrect, I have provided my own samples to 7.


No CVA/Walgreens/etc has said come in for a blood draw.

 They also do not say to come in for a blood draw to vaccinated humans for the purpose of vaccination efficacy assessments.  They do however contract Labcorp who does millions of non-vaccinated blood draws.


No 'media' outlets have promoted it.

 Depends on your definition of media outlet as I have seen requests for non-vaccinated humans to provide blood samples - but never from what i would define as mainstream media.

 Of course if one human does not Observe any of this, it must not be Reality to them.  So I can see where all these things i have done myself are not "Really" true.