polio, mumps, rubella, tetanus, measles
no proof they work?

 Not if one already decides there is no proof.  Proof doesn't "already exist" so I can't present information on what my personal standard for proof is.  See how that works?

 We all know any human can decide what they will accept as a standard for something and that the standard does not already need to exist.  

 I will accept video footage of a successful heart transplant surgery and statements from the living patient as proof there was a successful heart surgery.  Saying it's hard to provide a personal standard for evidence unless heart surgery has already been done is nothing more than a tactic to avoiding being held to my own standards.  

 Right, but what would you consider to be proof of an effective mRNA process that would be a vaccine?  How does it become "proven"?  

 Just like how we can say proof of a polio vaccine = (Standards here) before the polio vaccine was even invented.  That is literally how all standards of proof are submitted and achieved.

Eegore wrote on Today at 10:20:35:


Polio has been virtually eradicated, that tells me the polio vaccine has been successful which is good enough for me.  
    Let me know when the mRNA gene therapy has eradicated covid. Until then please shut up cause I'm getting bored with you

Eegore wrote on Today at 10:20:35:


Please go away