thumperclone wrote on 12/30/24 at 13:50:11:


What proof ?      I see nothing !

Predictions from 25 years ago do not account for current circumstances

The scientific term is "Sh!t Happens"  

The Arctic very well may be ice free in the future. As I always say, of which, there is no argument against, if you had a time machine and set it to go backwards a fraction of a second ago on the earth’s geological clock, (a mere 15,000 years ago ) and decided to stand on the shores of Lake Michigan without the Chicago skyline interfering with your view, a fraction of a second ago, they weren’t there. It was an ice covered field.

The unanswerable question, and it is unanswerable, is what impact does a tiny amount of CO2 in the atmosphere have on the global average temperature. And the other big question, does whatever increase in temperature carry all negative consequences?

No one knows the answers to those questions, despite what you hear. So sit the Fxxk down, shut the fxxk up, and take a reasonable approach.

If you want to develop electric vehicles because they reduce air pollution and improves human health, then go ahead and make that argument. If you want to demand windmills and solar power so we reduce the air pollution caused by burning coal and other biomass, then make sure you tell everybody that, without nuclear power, the lifestyles of the developed world will have to be curtailed a little bit, and the undeveloped world will continue living in energy poverty so the developed world can at least have their toys. Be honest about it.

But don’t pin your hopes on sermons from some silly little Swedish girl that you turned into a puppet or some ex vice president, or John Kerry who we only know because he married a rich girl or the rest of these clowns who fly all over the world on private jets and tell us to live in energy poverty while they buy their second and third fully insured beachfront vacation home that they’re telling you is going to be wiped out by rising seawater levels.

It’s always a source of laughter when the same clowns who tell you global warming is caused by rich and evil corporations who put profits above the knowledge that they’re destroying the world…….while at the same time they’re able to fully insure their beachfront homes by working with…..wait for it…. rich and evil insurance corporations who by all rights  should certainly refuse to insure their property knowing that it’s going to be swept away this decade by encroaching seawater.

Global warming religious fanatics are some of the most gullible people on the planet.

How refreshing, a clear argument. One that I'm Sure will be rebutted in an equally reasoned and reasonable manner.

That Is a good one
If ya scroll down, there's a buncha good ones

cfcs are the manmade culprits for the hole in the ozone leading to Antarctic ice shelf melting

thumperclone wrote on 12/31/24 at 10:51:08:



Duude,, you are so far off base. I'm talking about the beginning of the end of the last ice age, prior To the Younger Drias.
Why, after being so wrong about fukkin EVERYTHING, are you So determined to remain so ignorant?

Serowbot wrote on 12/31/24 at 11:32:45:

"...You can payoff a scientist as easily as you can payoff a politician ..."

Modified again:

"You can payoff a scientist
        EASIER
then you can payoff a politician.