SuzukiSavage.com - Clueless

thumperclone Serious Thumper Alliance Member Offline PGR rider riding with respect Posts: 6374 Grand Junction Colorado Gender:	Re: Clueless Reply #15 - 11/28/24 at 10:34:25 no guarantee Biden would have got the nomination
Back to top	standing for those who stood for US IP Logged

JOG Serious Thumper Offline SuzukiSavage.com Rocks! Posts: 1480 Longview, Texas Gender:	Re: Clueless Reply #16 - 11/28/24 at 15:56:47 thumperclone wrote on 11/28/24 at 10:34:25: no guarantee Biden would have got the nomination Not the Point. The point you so deftly DOGEd was IF Joe had been on the ballot,Row would have voted for him.
Back to top	IP Logged

Serowbot YaBB Moderator ModSquad Offline OK.... so what's the speed of dark? Posts: 28930 Tucson Az Gender:	Re: Clueless Reply #17 - 11/29/24 at 07:22:15 Nothing changes the fact that you voted for guy that thinks his cognition test would get him into Harvard
Back to top	Ludicrous Speed !... ... ... IP Logged

JOG Serious Thumper Offline SuzukiSavage.com Rocks! Posts: 1480 Longview, Texas Gender:	Re: Clueless Reply #18 - 11/29/24 at 07:27:18 I voted for the guy who is going to scrape the green goo out of the festering wound of waste on society. Your decrepit commie did nothing For America. If he did anything that wasn't costly or stupid or unconstitutional, please, tell me.
Back to top	IP Logged

Serowbot YaBB Moderator ModSquad Offline OK.... so what's the speed of dark? Posts: 28930 Tucson Az Gender:	Re: Clueless Reply #19 - 11/29/24 at 08:50:41 Why didn't he do it 4 years ago?
Back to top	Ludicrous Speed !... ... ... IP Logged

thumperclone

Serious Thumper
Alliance Member

Offline

PGR rider riding
with respect

Posts: 6374
Grand Junction Colorado
Gender: male

Re: Clueless
Reply #20 - 11/29/24 at 09:27:19

JOG wrote on 11/29/24 at 07:27:18:

I voted for the guy who is going to scrape the green goo out of the festering wound of waste on society. Your decrepit commie did nothing For America. If he did anything that wasn't costly or stupid or unconstitutional, please, tell me.

turn that coin over and YOU list what was costly or stupid or unconstitutional

Back to top

standing for those who stood for US

IP Logged

JOG Serious Thumper Offline SuzukiSavage.com Rocks! Posts: 1480 Longview, Texas Gender:	Re: Clueless Reply #21 - 11/29/24 at 09:48:37 That commie mutherfukker didn't do anything that didn't fukk America Trump screwed UP with the Jabs. Can you name anything FJB did that was bad?
Back to top	IP Logged

thumperclone Serious Thumper Alliance Member Offline PGR rider riding with respect Posts: 6374 Grand Junction Colorado Gender:	Re: Clueless Reply #22 - 11/29/24 at 09:58:24 JOG wrote on 11/29/24 at 09:48:37: That commie mutherfukker didn't do anything that didn't fukk America Trump screwed UP with the Jabs. Can you name anything FJB did that was bad? SO you got nothing thought so
Back to top	standing for those who stood for US IP Logged

JOG Serious Thumper Offline SuzukiSavage.com Rocks! Posts: 1480 Longview, Texas Gender:	Re: Clueless Reply #23 - 11/29/24 at 10:44:27 You think Suing the states trying to protect their own borders was constitutional?
Back to top	IP Logged

thumperclone Serious Thumper Alliance Member Offline PGR rider riding with respect Posts: 6374 Grand Junction Colorado Gender:	Re: Clueless Reply #24 - 11/29/24 at 13:03:25 JOG wrote on 11/29/24 at 10:44:27: You think Suing the states trying to protect their own borders was constitutional? I'm not aware of what you are talking about care to provide a readable resource?
Back to top	standing for those who stood for US IP Logged

Eegore

Serious Thumper

Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 8719

Re: Clueless
Reply #25 - 11/29/24 at 15:36:26

You think Suing the states trying to protect their own borders was constitutional?

Yes. Just because people don't like a law doesn't make it "Unconstitutional", that's a tired and almost always inaccurate argument.
Nothing about the ruling, allowing the buoys to stay, debated the "Constitutionality" of the initial suit, so that for one should be considerable evidence.

What would have been "Unconstitutional" would be enforcing the action without suing. That would have been against the US Constitution.

Back to top

IP Logged

Eegore Serious Thumper Offline SuzukiSavage.com Rocks! Posts: 8719	Re: Clueless Reply #26 - 11/29/24 at 15:36:49 "I'm not aware of what you are talking about care to provide a readable resource?" https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/news/releases/attorney-general-ken-paxto... https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/images/press/Border%...
Back to top	IP Logged

JOG Serious Thumper Offline SuzukiSavage.com Rocks! Posts: 1480 Longview, Texas Gender:	Re: Clueless Reply #27 - 11/29/24 at 18:23:15 We will continue to disagree.
Back to top	IP Logged

Eegore Serious Thumper Offline SuzukiSavage.com Rocks! Posts: 8719	Re: Clueless Reply #28 - 11/29/24 at 21:19:46 We will continue to disagree. Sure thing however US law agrees with me. Not liking something doesn't all the sudden make it "Unconstitutional". Why wasn't the case against TX, when it was ruled in TX favor, missing the portion about it being an "Unconstitutional" action? Seems like they would want to add that in.
Back to top	IP Logged

JOG Serious Thumper Offline SuzukiSavage.com Rocks! Posts: 1480 Longview, Texas Gender:	Re: Clueless Reply #29 - 11/29/24 at 21:24:35 It's the Fed's Job to protect OUR borders. If they won't, the states have every right to protect Their citizens from invasion.
Back to top	IP Logged