You do YOU, so well !

 I do.  It is a human opinion that a human does YOU so well.  The previous sentence indicates an human opinion.

 Reference for human opinion:

o·pin·ion
[əˈpiny(ə)n]
noun
a view or judgment formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge:
"I'm writing to voice my opinion on an issue of great importance" · "that, in my opinion, is dead right"
Similar:
belief
judgment
thought(s)
school of thought

the beliefs or views of a large number or majority of people about a particular thing:
"the changing climate of opinion"
(opinion of)
an estimation of the quality or worth of someone or something:
"I had a higher opinion of myself than I deserved"
a formal statement of advice by an expert on a professional matter:
"seeking a second opinion from a specialist"

 The previous reference indicates this post is a human opinion.

 
 My Observed Reality is that the government there is less active in suppressing medical opinion.  It is an opinion that a government is less active in suppressing medical opinion.  Reference for opinion follows:

o·pin·ion
[əˈpiny(ə)n]
noun
a view or judgment formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge:
"I'm writing to voice my opinion on an issue of great importance" · "that, in my opinion, is dead right"
Similar:
belief
judgment
thought(s)
school of thought

the beliefs or views of a large number or majority of people about a particular thing:
"the changing climate of opinion"
(opinion of)
an estimation of the quality or worth of someone or something:
"I had a higher opinion of myself than I deserved"
a formal statement of advice by an expert on a professional matter:
"seeking a second opinion from a specialist"

 This post indicates a human opinion.  Reference for human opinion:

o·pin·ion
[əˈpiny(ə)n]
noun
a view or judgment formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge:
"I'm writing to voice my opinion on an issue of great importance" · "that, in my opinion, is dead right"
Similar:
belief
judgment
thought(s)
school of thought

the beliefs or views of a large number or majority of people about a particular thing:
"the changing climate of opinion"
(opinion of)
an estimation of the quality or worth of someone or something:
"I had a higher opinion of myself than I deserved"
a formal statement of advice by an expert on a professional matter:
"seeking a second opinion from a specialist"


 This post is an opinion.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/covid-vax-deaths-vs-covid-deaths/

Interesting conversation!

Questions: Didn't the insurance companies observe a bigger spike in deaths AFTER the vaccines were rolled out? And didn't undertakers everywhere pull huge and unnatural clots out of the dead, again, after the jab? And didn't hundreds of young fit athletes drop dead of post-jab myocarditis? Aren't all these unprecedented?

I won't try to answer these questions here. I would only humbly suggest that, where the data exists but is being ignored, these questions, and others like them, need a lot more than snopes to settle them.

Eegore wrote on 12/02/24 at 12:00:05:





you can pretend that there were no abuses with the official registration of covid deaths.

But I do not participate in denial and do not let myself be intimidated by so-called official data.

Because among them were also many people who died from the side effects and from the treatment itself. At the time, much that turned out to be disadvantageous to the vaccine was written off as a cause of death due to covid.

But people who died of flu were also added to the covid deaths in order to inflate the figures in order to sell the vaccine.

And let us not forget that there was already a patent for the covid vaccine on the shelf well before the covid period. And that there was an action plan ready in case of a major epidemic (all arranged by the globalist movement)

And let's talk about the 1000 other abuses surrounding covid.

If you then look at the mass intimidation of both the medical world and the population, then you can safely speak of the crime of the century.

you can pretend that there were no abuses with the official registration of covid deaths.

 So can you.  I never said, or used, Official registration of Covid deaths in my assessments.  That won't stop people from lying and saying that I did though, even after admitting they never even bothered to look at any of it.  



Because among them were also many people who died from the side effects and from the treatment itself. At the time, much that turned out to be disadvantageous to the vaccine was written off as a cause of death due to covid.

 The problem here is the reliability of such data.  Your "proof" of graphene in the vaccine is an example.  The only remotely reliable method is to look at rates of death, overall, before and after the vaccine.  But for some reason some members say the numbers before the vaccine "doesn't matter".  Really?  There are more deaths after, but we don't use "before" to calculate that?   1+1=2, but in this case we are to believe ???+1=Millions dead.



And let us not forget that there was already a patent for the covid vaccine on the shelf well before the covid period.

 Misleading.  There were MRNA patents but no Covid19 specific patents.  The "patent race" for the C-19 specific vaccine is very well documented and studied.  One of the components of that is the multiple lying articles chopping up other patents and falsely adding in Covid 19 to the phrasing.



And that there was an action plan ready in case of a major epidemic (all arranged by the globalist movement)

 Of course there was.  There have been action plans for mass disease mitigation since the 30's.  Technically since the Black Plague.  People will try to make money on it.



And let's talk about the 1000 other abuses surrounding covid.

 And also the abuses of blatantly lying sources of the vaccine like "proof" of graphene in the vaccine that was nothing more than a description of a slide on an electron microscope, or the 8 Million dead kids in 2021, the millions of miscarriages, thousands of disabled military per-day, Comirnaty as a compound not a name, mass FEMA executions, human burn pits, vaccines causing spontaneous combustion, etc, etc.


 Abuse is on both sides.  We have to filter the lies on both ends.  Instead I see a lot of one-sided scrutiny.

And let us not forget that there was already a patent for the covid vaccine on the shelf well before the covid period.

Misleading.  There were MRNA patents but no Covid19 specific patents.  The "patent race" for the C-19 specific vaccine is very well documented and studied.  One of the components of that is the multiple lying articles chopping up other patents and falsely adding in Covid 19 to the phrasing.

I looked it up:

The COVID-19 pandemic officially began in December 2019, when an unusual lung disease was noted in the city of Wuhan, China. The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the outbreak a pandemic on March 11, 2020.


Origin of SARS-CoV-2:

There is no conclusive evidence that the SARS-CoV-2 virus (COVID-19) existed in a laboratory before the outbreak. Most scientists believe that the virus was transmitted from nature (probably from bats) to humans, possibly via an intermediary such as another animal (for example, a wild animal traded in a market in Wuhan).

However, there has been much speculation about the possibility of a lab leak, especially around the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which is known for its research on coronaviruses in bats. However, no direct evidence has been found that SARS-CoV-2 accidentally escaped from a laboratory. The majority of scientists believe it is more likely that the virus was transmitted to humans via a natural route.

Of course, these are purely the data that have been presented via official channels. And why should we doubt the globalist movement (black rock) that is not only government but also big pharma.

My position is that covid was among other things an exercise in obedience and a means to adjust laws and give NGOs a stronger legal basis as policy prescribers for governments and also to give those governments more power over the people.

Which, by the way, has been perfectly successful.

I almost forgot, Normally it takes 10 to 15 years for a vaccine to come to market.

I looked it up:

 And presented nothing that addresses the portion of my post you quoted.




I almost forgot, Normally it takes 10 to 15 years for a vaccine to come to market.

 Come to market is not equal to patent existing.  Your claim is the patent for the vaccine existed before "the covid period".  None of your response addresses this .  MRNA patents existed, not the "covid vaccine on the shelf" as you put it.

 There is no evidence, including what you posted here, that shows the "on the shelf" covid vaccine was patented "well before" Covid19 existed.  this should be very easy to prove.  Simply pull any of the hundreds of thousands of internet archives, which by the way was done many times.  There is no patent evidence except those that were altered.

 And that right there is the problem.  Using an unrelated real issue, like exercise in obedience to also claim completely false information is true.  The willingness to repeat lies online is also an experiment in obedience.

 Your response is also an example of one-sided scrutiny of evidence.  



 

btw I had to watch police academy one after this discussion to remember why I love america.(so much)