That The Polls, AFAIK all had the election as Close, but the Difference in Rally Attendance was YUGE? And the results of the election was very much in line with the differences in Rally Attendance...
Howboutthatschitt!!??
It's Shocking just how valuable Observing Reality can be.

 How does Observed Reality address all the people that Observed larger Harris rallies?  In their Observed Reality all the sudden rallies are no longer accurate - after all they only Observed Harris rallies as being larger.  So for Trump supporters rallies as evidence of who will win are "real" as they Observed Trump rallies, but for Harris supporters it is not "real" because they never Observed larger Trump rallies.

 Yes millions of humans on other forums, social media sites, Reddit etc. Observed only Harris rallies were larger - because of the internet content they chose to use.  My opinion is millions of humans on other forums, social media sites, Reddit etc. Observed only Harris rallies were larger - because of the internet content they chose to use.

 The "whose was bigger" argument was everywhere.  This is an opinion.  

 My opinion is The "whose was bigger" argument was everywhere.  The previous sentence indicates a human opinion.

Reference for opinion:

o·pin·ion
[əˈpiny(ə)n]
noun
a view or judgment formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge:
"I'm writing to voice my opinion on an issue of great importance" · "that, in my opinion, is dead right"
Similar:
belief
judgment
thought(s)
school of thought

the beliefs or views of a large number or majority of people about a particular thing:
"the changing climate of opinion"
(opinion of)
an estimation of the quality or worth of someone or something:
"I had a higher opinion of myself than I deserved"
a formal statement of advice by an expert on a professional matter:
"seeking a second opinion from a specialist"

 So Observed Reality is real for trump supporters, but not real for Harris supporters.  This is an opinion.  The previous sentence indicates a human opinion.  

o·pin·ion
[əˈpiny(ə)n]
noun
a view or judgment formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge:
"I'm writing to voice my opinion on an issue of great importance" · "that, in my opinion, is dead right"
Similar:
belief
judgment
thought(s)
school of thought

the beliefs or views of a large number or majority of people about a particular thing:
"the changing climate of opinion"
(opinion of)
an estimation of the quality or worth of someone or something:
"I had a higher opinion of myself than I deserved"
a formal statement of advice by an expert on a professional matter:
"seeking a second opinion from a specialist"

 This post is an opinion.

o·pin·ion
[əˈpiny(ə)n]
noun
a view or judgment formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge:
"I'm writing to voice my opinion on an issue of great importance" · "that, in my opinion, is dead right"
Similar:
belief
judgment
thought(s)
school of thought

the beliefs or views of a large number or majority of people about a particular thing:
"the changing climate of opinion"
(opinion of)
an estimation of the quality or worth of someone or something:
"I had a higher opinion of myself than I deserved"
a formal statement of advice by an expert on a professional matter:
"seeking a second opinion from a specialist"

 Rally attendance is too small of a sample size to reliably predict a POTUS.  

 Humans that support Harris swear up and down she had the larger rally attendance, using cellphone demographics, videos, images, personal statements etc. etc. etc.

 Their Observed Reality is Harris had larger rallies.  So Observed Reality for them is not objective truth.  Evidence does not support their Observed Reality.


 My opinion is rally attendance is too small of a sample size to reliably predict a POTUS.  This is an opinion.  The previous sentence indicates a human opinion.  This is a human opinion.

 A human opinion specific to me is Humans that support Harris swear up and down she had the larger rally attendance, using cellphone demographics, videos, images, personal statements etc. etc. etc.  This is a human opinion.

 It is an opinion that "Their Observed Reality is Harris had larger rallies."

 It is a human opinion that "Observed Reality for them is not objective truth."  

 It is a human opinion that "Evidence does not support their Observed Reality."  This opinion is underlined for emphasis.  It is an opinion that the underlined portion is for emphasis.  Emphasis is a human opinion.

 This post is an opinion.

 Reference for "opinion" without emphasis:

o·pin·ion
[əˈpiny(ə)n]
noun
a view or judgment formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge:
"I'm writing to voice my opinion on an issue of great importance" · "that, in my opinion, is dead right"
Similar:
belief
judgment
thought(s)
school of thought

the beliefs or views of a large number or majority of people about a particular thing:
"the changing climate of opinion"
(opinion of)
an estimation of the quality or worth of someone or something:
"I had a higher opinion of myself than I deserved"
a formal statement of advice by an expert on a professional matter:
"seeking a second opinion from a specialist"

And yet, I said what I said, the polls said what They said, and the differences between the rally attendance and the differences in the voting ,,MEHH,, you're wrong,, Again

 Then how do you explain all the Harris supporters who Observed all the "Harris rallies are huge" internet articles, phone reports, maps, videos and personal statements?

 I said their sample size was too small also.

 Again: I said their sample size was too small also..

 So I was right according to their Observed Reality.

 Their Observed Reality is Harris had larger rallies.  So Observed Reality for them is not objective truth.  Evidence does not support their Observed Reality.

You gaslighting ,,fuuuk..

 I'm not gaslighting, you just aren't understanding, or are refusing to Observe that I am saying Harris rallies weren't larger.

 Harris supporters think her rallies were bigger based off their Observed Reality.  They chose internet articles that supported Harris and so in their Observed Reality Harris had larger rallies.

 In their Observed Reality.  Not actual reality - their Observed Reality.

 

I already..

She HIRED PEOPLE TO DRAW A CROWD..


 Yes.  So in Harris supporters Observed Reality she had larger rallies. due to HIRED PEOPLE TO DRAW A CROWD.  Can you not understand that?

 This means when I told them that rally size is not large enough of a sample to accurately predict an election of over a hundred million humans, I was right - if we use Harris supporters Observed Reality as the metric and not actual reality.

 Objective truth is not equal to Observed Reality.  

Ohh,stoppit.. I was right. Get over it.

 So was I.  Get over it.

A question;
'Who is them' ?

 Humans that presented online evidence that Harris rallies were larger than Trump rallies.  In their ("their" means humans that used online evidence that Harris rallies were larger than Trump rallies.) Observed Reality Harris rallies were much larger.

 So if Harris supporters Observed Reality is that her rallies were larger, then their Observed Reality is not supported by actual evidence.  This is the problem with using Observed Reality as a qualifier instead of objective truth and empirical evidence.  

 It all depends on what one chooses to Observe.

No,the Difference is
One was organic
The other
Astroturf.


 The difference is Trump supporters Observed Reality is that Trump rallies were larger, and Harris supporters Observed reality is that Harris rallies were larger.  

 Humans can Observe lies as equally as they Observe truth.  Humans can Observe inaccurate information as easily as they can accurate information.

 Harris supporters Observed Reality, by your assessment is inaccurate, but that inaccuracy does not change their Observed reality.  To them, larger rallies, that they Observed did not accurately predict a POTUS.

 This was a 50/50 no matter what.  Literally a baboon flipping a coin had the same chances as anyone else.