JOG wrote on Today at 07:09:07:Realclearpolitics also predicted Clinton by a landslide in 2016. They
I'm not even going to try to unpack the errors in understanding going on there.
I'll do a quick outline.
That was an attempt to create the perception she was ahead. Even Donna Brazeal Said after the big trip, hitting the towns,She has No Support. The polls were Bullschitt to create the illusion, so the Cheat wouldn't be obvious. They underestimated Trump's support, and didn't dial in enough cheat. Unlike the people here,they learned. And Dialed it Up in 20.
RCP isn't necessarily a participant in trying to create a false perception. If they use corrupted data, the outcome is corrupted.
I don’t think it was an attempt to create the impression she was ahead, I think they discovered their methodology was flawed.
Are some polls corrupted by purposeful bias? Are some polls corrupted by unconscious bias? Yes, absolutely but that’s the value of averaging.
Many legitimate pollsters were shocked at how deep Trump’s support in blue collar workers was.