The guns versus no guns indicates his line of thought.  People who were there unarmed protesting were part of the "We" and those that were there armed are not part of the "We".

 Kind of like saying we were at a parade and none of us were armed, but there is video evidence of a guy with a gun on his hip so I am complicit, and lying about being there with guns.

 Am I?  If I go to a parade unarmed with 10 humans and say "we" went, am I lying if any of the other humans besides the 10 I went with are armed?

Your Opinion.. Phhht.

guns or not he's admitting complicity which he has denied till now

 I'm not sure he is.  If the word "we" is how one is to conclude complicity among the actions of hundreds of humans, then any single human that says "we" did something at an event is complicit in the criminal behavior of any other human at the event.  We can't just apply rules to Trump and not other humans.

 A group of humans I associate with went to a football game.  I encouraged "everyone" to go on my social media accounts.  I said "we all went to the game together".

 A guy got drunk and punched someone.  So am I complicit in that human's behavior?  Am I also to be charged with assault?

 I did after all admit I invited "everyone" and that "we all" went.  So am I complicit in the violence?

This post is my opinion for anyone incapable of understanding what an opinion is.

You do know I was agreeing with you, right?

 Yes.

You interpret that the way You want to. For You, it's Proof. It's Your Poopinion.
Just more stupid lefty schitt.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/GhExT3XudGc