I watched the debate in a hotel room with a bunch of men on my motorcycle trip, and during the debate, I bet someone a bottle of Woodford reserve that Harris would win.

Why?

Because she can be a very good speaker and talk for a long time without saying absolutely anything of importance and I think that resonates with a lot of people who have been brainwashed, so I figured it was a safe bet.

However, I’m not so sure anymore. I’m not willing at this point to make a real bet who’s going to win. I figured Harris would probably win, but as more time goes on when she’s out on the trail by herself, I feel like things are tightening up, and Trump might be able to pull this off after all.

Trump is running not just against her but against the media and entertainment cultures which makes it three against one, so it would be quite a feat to do it two times (I think he won the second time, so technically this would be his third win) but I think it’s much closer than I thought it would be. I underestimated Harris’s ability to look like the idiot she is.

I find the 3 on 1 comment pretty comical too.  Maybe I’m unique (probably not) and I’m just getting a more balanced view through various sources.  There seems to be a significant amount of anti-Harris “information” (or misinformation) floating around out there.  You yourself and others sure don’t seem to have a problem finding it.  It’s like you’re making excuses for an outcome that hasn’t happened yet.  If we can’t win, we’ll just cry, call foul, and make excuses.  Kinda the definition of poor losers (or just losers).

You’re a bright guy, but you hurt your own credibility with poorly constructed comments.

ThumperPaul wrote on Today at 05:18:44:


The popular vote doesn’t matter.

zevenenergie wrote on Today at 07:28:36:


I think it’s still possible Trump wins. You’re right in the sense that Harris just bleeds fakeness. She’s a complete lie. You can’t say that about Trump. Trump is exactly who he presents himself to be while Harris is the opposite, she hides herself.

ThumperPaul wrote on Today at 05:35:27:

Apparently you are not paying attention.

   electoral votes

Only two States correctly apply electoral votes. Only 4 times was the 'popular' vote more than the electoral vote for a person.

Here is a very simple explanation on how they work. "...A state gets two votes per senator. One vote per Representative..."  (the number of districts it has) "...All States, except for Maine and Nebraska, have a winner-take-all policy where the State looks only at the overall winner of the state-wide popular vote..."

Many years ago electoral votes brought representation to people living in 'Rural' areas of a State. Years ago the Metro ares were full of regular people.

Today Metro areas have a significant population of, Ner-Do-Wells, who get by by using other peoples tax money.
And the Rural areas have working Citizens.

A Example:
In 2020, Calf 55 Votes to Biden
Minn 10 Voted to Biden.

SHOULD have been, (like 2 states),
Calf 20 Trump / 35 Biden
MN 5 Trump / 5 Biden

Changing the electoral vote system would take a Major Constitutional change.

And the UL, Socialists that have worked their way in the less noticed positions in State government, will block any effort to change, the WORKING, Tax paying, peoples vote.

If a Cackling, Word Salad, DFI, and a Scardy Cat Bully win, it will be simply because those people are NOT, paying any attention.
And are doing ONLY what they are TOLD to do.