Serowbot wrote on 09/17/24 at 15:05:31:

I realize, compared to you, I probably sound God-like  when displaying my wisdom. But…..these are just my opinions, not Commandments.

sure, but for elected office, I get a little bit suspicious, and again all things being equal I would prefer someone else. Remember, all things being equal you’re certainly married women with kids who were absolute freaking lunatics compared to single women without kids. I get it. This is a broad generalization.

 Ok so you are talking specifically questioning elected officials without children and not questioning private citizens without children that own a business, military promotions or other positions of authority.  

 
I never said I did. Why would I do that, I wouldn’t. You’re sounding like a Democratic member of the media now making up stuff.

 I never said You said that, I am asking, and then proposing alternative point of view that I am unsure of.  I am unsure of why one, or specifically, any single human, would prohibit childless humans from positions of authority.  Not something You specifically have proposed.



Not necessarily now. But again, all things being equal, and I mean equal, I think I would select someone who was married with kids. But then again, I’m not exactly sure what a county commissioner will impact me.

 What do you mean by "Not necessarily now"?  Is there a future time that a human without children should not own a business or have an elected position?  Or your opinion now, based off lack of knowledge on Commissioner impacts?  FYI they basically run the county budget.

 I'm not sure about the marriage thing either.  If one get's divorced would they lose their position of authority?


all things being equal, I would prefer a married man with kids, yes.

 I understand allowing the constituent to choose what they prefer, but I am not sure I understand why any prohibitions of such positions should exist based of marriage and children.  As in any human's idea that marriage and children is an important value to them, and as such must be placed as a value on others in order to contribute to society from an elected position.  

 Not that You proposed that, but that's specifically what Vance has talked about, and others.  Marriage and children are important to them, so others must do that to, or they can't hold office.