Yeah but they have SEEN global warming on live TV.  Just look at all those bulldozers in the Amazon, or the glaciers falling apart.

 There's internet articles they never read that have headlines saying how bad climate change is.  Their Observed reality, (the weather in their neighborhood and the good ol' internet), supports the articles they won't read, data they won't look at, and directly conflicts with the assessments of the humans that read it all for them then tried to tell them what the data actually really says.

 Simple explanation here.  Ask why if the vaccine is currently and not theoretically, killing millions of kids and athletes and US military - are there not the predicted millions of funerals, yearbook memorials, school enrollment drops etc.

 Whatever process in their minds, that those missing outcomes are justified, is also how climate alarmists justify their position.  The truth is they never looked at any of it, they just re-posted and repeated headlines of internet information that aligned with what they already decided was true.  

 Once asked to use actual real evidence of the world around them, they just sling insults, and scurry back to the internet - literally ignoring every Observable thing that could prove their position in favor of finding another internet headline.  The only way to keep their stance is to avoid any conversation about the clearly Observable outcomes that never happened.


Words,sentences, logical flow, reasonable conclusion..
It's called conversation. Useful in communication.


 Yeah these climate alarmists calling people "gutless" and "jakkasses" for not responding in a yet undisclosed amount of time applies how?  I wonder how they think telling people to "Fukkoff", is useful in communication.

Yeah these climate alarmists calling people "gutless" and "jakkasses" for not responding in a yet undisclosed amount of time applies how

Your hallucinations came back?

The climate Is changing.
Read what I said.
It's been changing since the world started. North America had about a two MILE thick cap of ice up north. Europe has evidence of vineyards further north than they grow today from the medieval warm period.

There is no emergency. It's a scam.

Your hallucinations came back?

 You want to claim you never got upset that people didn't respond to your posts?  I'm just wondering how a guy that repeatedly for years insults members for not replying to him in an timeframe he won't even have the courtesy to define, wants to talk about how to have a discussion. Why would we listen to that guy?



The climate Is changing.
Read what I said.
It's been changing since the world started. North America had about a two MILE thick cap of ice up north. Europe has evidence of vineyards further north than they grow today from the medieval warm period.

There is no emergency. It's a scam.


 And the insurance company "proof" about vaccine deaths you brought up just the other day?  Not a scam?  

 You ignore Observable facts the same way climate alarmists do.  You still won't acknowledge there are no additional dead kids, just in your area, years after you showed "Proof" of "Dead" kids.  No evidence today supports that.  

 Whatever methods you use to justify repeating that the vaccine killed kids - even though time has shown it didn't - is how climate alarmists justify the end of man, even though time has shown it isn't.  Same strategies.  

 All I am saying is the same logic you use to keep saying the vaccine kills kids is the same logic climate alarmists use to keep saying the end is near.

2023 hottest on record
2023 2325  heat related deaths

 Greybeard is pointing out that the doomsday predictions keep moving.  2023 heat is not proof of causal man-made climate change.  The predictions for 1995 never happened so they moved to 2000, then 2010, then 2020, and maybe by 2030 the massive climate destruction predicted 35 years prior might happen.

 Anyone can find any climate related information they want online.  Want bad climate news?  It's there.  Good climate news?  That's there too.

 The problem isn't future discussion, its that people keep ignoring that the predictions never panned out.