Is playing the “stolen valor “card against Waltz technically correct according to legislation passed? Probably not. But then calling January 6 an insurrection isn’t correct either especially during the George Floyd protest. You had rioters trying to get in the White House for a couple of nights and they were on polished completely.

The problem with Waltz is they already went in and changed his bio. There’s a history of people in his unit complaining that he bailed on them and that was long before he was selected as VP so it’s a significant problem for him.

Is playing the “stolen valor “card against Waltz technically correct according to legislation passed? Probably not. But then calling January 6 an insurrection isn’t correct either especially during the George Floyd protest. You had rioters trying to get in the White House for a couple of nights and they were on polished completely.


 I'd agree that calling Jan 6th in itself an insurrection is inaccurate.  There were a few humans there for that purpose, but the event as it unfolded I would not say meets the criteria.

 I'm not sure that retiring after 24 years is "bailing" on anyone, but I don't know the exact circumstances.  At what point is leaving a job not "bailing"?  Did he have some commitments unmet?  I wouldn't be surprised.