Harris constantly mentions she is for, ‘freedom”

What she does NOT say,
   it is, the freedom
to do, what she tells you to do !!!!!

“…When she was still vying for the Democratic presidential nomination, California senator Kamala Harris proposed a series of executive actions that would have made way for stricter gun control measures…”

“…While campaigning for the presidential nomination, Harris said she would enact multiple executive orders on gun control…”

“…The new office of gun violence prevention will be led by Vice President Kamala Harris, a former prosecutor whose experience is perfect for this effort, Biden said. The office’s goals include ensuring a bipartisan gun safety law passed last year is fully implemented nationwide along with Biden’s executive actions to stop gun violence…”

“…Harris publicly committed to a host of executive actions that she would have undertaken if elected to the Oval Office, including mandating universal background checks, revoking the licenses of (and possibly prosecuting) gun manufacturers who break the law, closing a legal loophole in order to prevent those convicted of domestic violence from purchasing a firearm, and banning AR-15-style assault weapons from being imported into the country…”

“…Sen. Kamala Harris says if she is elected President, she will give Congress 100 days "to get their act together and have the courage to pass reasonable gun safety laws, and if they fail to do it, then I will take executive action…”

“…will seek to find new actions the White House can take unilaterally as further congressional support for gun safety laws seems slim..;.”

“…HARRIS: When I was speaking with these young leaders, before I walked in here, they were talking about, hey, shouldn't we be looking at people's backgrounds before they can buy a gun? Yes, young leaders, I said to them. You are absolutely right…”

“…Harris emphasized the need for stricter gun control measures, including universal background checks and an assault weapons ban. She pledged to work towards ending gun violence and keeping communities safe…”

"We will finally pass red flag laws, universal background checks, and an assault weapons ban," Harris said...."

“…Harris’ voting record in the Senate is certainly one of the most liberal…”

“…After six years as California’s attorney general, Harris was elected to the US Senate in 2016. Since then, she has co-sponsored bills aligned with several liberal causes including expanding gun control measures and passing “Medicare for All.”

“…And specifically what I will do is put in place a requirement that for anyone who sells more than five guns a year, they are required to do background checks when they sell those guns. I will require that for any gun dealer that breaks the law, the ATF take their license…”

Guess she doesn't KNOW, red flag laws, universal background checks, firearm bans, breaking BATFE law, ALREADY are in play !!!!

Well, it is to be expected as she does not have a clue what a Illegal alien is, as she believes, all non Citizens should receive, a stipend, provided by the Forced Saving plan, ALL Working CITIZENS PAID INTO.

Harris was the most liberal Senator in her time there and is a classic socialist at heart. “Equity for thee, but not for me” is probably a tattoo she should consider.
Harris is an existential threat to our Democracy and must be stopped.

Well, it is to be expected as she does not have a clue what a Illegal alien is, as she believes, all non Citizens should receive, a stipend, provided by the Forced Saving plan, ALL Working CITIZENS PAID INTO.

 So this isn't true because, as we discussed before, SSR is not where those funds come from.  That doesn't mean I support these financial allocations, it only means I will acknowledge the fact that SSI and SSR are two different funds that gain assets by different means.

 The number of people that think their SSR benefits will be gone because disabled/immigrant/inmates/people that never worked etc. are getting the money is ridiculous.  

Forced general fund contributions are however given away inappropriately in many cases.

 SSDI, is predicted to last until 2098 although most people will read into the 2035 "if not a dime is added" calculations and claim it will all go away in 10 years.  "THEY" is probably not the SSA but some other nonsense, similar to those "reports" lying about people that never work still get retirement benefits.

 I specifically recall being told in 5th grade to save up because Social Security will be gone in 10 years.  If they were the same thing, and they are not no matter how good it feels to pretend and complain about it, it would still be a calculation that's 30 years late with at least 30 more to go.

Where would the money come from?

 General fund.  It is taxes but it is inaccurate to claim it is: "provided by the Forced Saving plan, ALL Working CITIZENS PAID INTO" which heavily implies it is from SSRI income taxes, as you have directly claimed before.


And exactly who would be covered ?

 Humans who qualify for SSDI.




So in the case of Cal Care in California.

 Cal Care is not funded by a Forced Saving plan, ALL Working CITIZENS PAID INTO, so it doesn't apply to my assessment.  It does exactly what I said, it uses a general fund, or as you describe it here a Public Trust Fund.  

 Would it be accurate for me to claim that Cal Care is funded by "the" Forced Saving plan, ALL Working CITIZENS PAID INTO, when it is actually paid into by multiple tax revenues and does not take tax revenue from any other fund?

 It would not.  No more accurate than claiming illegals and "people that never had a job" get paid from "My" social security retirement benefits.  The few people that get paid from SSRI qualify based off being married to a single income-earner over decades, and its extremely rare.  
 

Wonder if any, Citizens , who WORK and PAY TAXES, fund the, 'free' healthcare. And where it comes from.


 They outline exactly where it comes from, and you already stated it.  What we can say for sure is it does not come from SSRI.  It does come from taxes so humans that PAY TAXES will partially fund it.

Who funds the: ' public Trust Fund '

 Its outlined in the financial allocations breakdown.  Typically the public funds public trust funds so that should be no surprise.


Who pays the monies to: ' federal and state government agencies '

 Millions of people.  Specifically what appropriated fund sections are you wanting to know about.  In CA alone that would be about 900 pages of info.  How would you like that broken down?


What are, and who PAYS the: ' additional revenue sources '

 This is broken down in the financial allocations section.  What part of that is not clear?


Please explain: "Benefits may be taxed depending on one's income and tax filing status."
(Regarding Social Security info)

 It means funds paid out can be taxed depending on a human's income and their filing status when paying taxes.  How else would that be explained?  What part of that sentence doesn't make sense to you?



Then explain where those TAXES go.

 We would have to look at each human individually to explain where each humans specific tax allocations go.  If anyone from CA wants to volunteer all of their financial records we could break it down.



Again the POINT is.
Hard working Citizen, Taxpayer Money,
   FUNDS !

ILLEGAL Non Citizens,
Who never have,
and NEVER WILL,
pay one cent.


 Agreed.  But not the SSRI funds as was directly stated before and heavily implied here.  It should be clear from past discussions that saying something was "implied" is equal to claiming it as absolute fact where the human who actually posted the words is not to have input on the perception.

So a employee is FORCED to pay into a, 'security' account.
A employer is FORCED to pay into a,  'security' account.

Now that money is taxed, please explain,
"...What part of that sentence doesn't make sense to you?..."


 You want me to explain that I asked what part doesn't make sense to you?

 What part of that sentence doesn't make sense?  Some humans will be taxed on the benefits.  Who those humans are depends on their income and filing status.  I'm not sure why you need that explained, and then need me to explain that I asked you what needs explained.


When it is said;
Citizen Taxpayers,
are paying
For NON Citizen, ILLEGALS.

(And Cameltoe thinks it is wonderful)


 Yeah.  None of those funds are coming from SSRI.  That's all I said.  Implying that it does is inaccurate.