Exactly how can 3 healthy people, having the same profession, that all had multipart FORCED vaccines, become Suddenly Dead, 3 days apart,
be compared with, climate change ? The same way you connect everything to gun rights.
JoG will not accept
only current data as a climate change argument. He, correctly, expects people to compare historical data to today's data. However we for some reason aren't expected to compare historical pilot deaths to today's. We just assume more pilots die today because we never Observed them before. Reality does not require our Observation.
Just like we are to only look today's dead athletes, but not past dead athletes. Why?
Why should climate change alarmists use historical data, including events they never Observed, but with vaccines we just look at today, and not historical data? Because we didn't Observe it?
In 1998 when conducting several studies on cosmic radiation and magnetic fields generated by the aircraft electrical systems and their connection to cancer they found out that the majority of pilots died from heart disease. Incidentally that was the number one killer of men, so it was no surprise, it was actually predicted.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9830605/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8546114/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2184284/ Now what you will hear is me saying people "should" take the "safe" vaccine. What I am actually saying is the vaccine very well could be killing more pilots, but I would want to
compare today to historical data. The same expectation JoG has of climate change alarmists. Wouldn't it be hypocritical to not apply the same expectations to other topics?