Home
Forum
Search
Login
Register
Merch
Donate
Welcome, Guest. Please
Login
or
Register
::
View Members
SuzukiSavage.com
›
General Category
›
Rubber Side Down!
› PWK40 Knockoff with E-Tube
(Moderators:
verslagen1
,
Dave
,
Serowbot
)
‹
Previous topic
|
Next topic
›
Pages:
1
...
3
4
5
PWK40 Knockoff with E-Tube (Read 282 times)
DragBikeMike
Serious Thumper
Offline
SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!
Posts: 4760
Honolulu
Re: PWK40 Knockoff with E-Tube
Reply #60 -
Yesterday
at 16:48:08
After I reinstalled the carburetor, the enrichment circuit worked much better. I could now leave the enricher pulled out for a awhile after the engine fired up, and it had a bit of a fast idle. Not as good as the standard PWK, but certainly acceptable.
I was concerned about adequate fuel delivery. I previously noted that the float bowl seemed to empty prematurely when I turned off the petcock while riding the last few blocks home. A quick check with a sight gage showed that the float bowl level was right about where you would want it, just below the gasket surface.
Back to top
eTube_Float_Level.jpg
Knowledge is power.
IP Logged
DragBikeMike
Serious Thumper
Offline
SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!
Posts: 4760
Honolulu
Re: PWK40 Knockoff with E-Tube
Reply #61 -
Yesterday
at 16:49:00
Once I was satisfied with the enrichment mod and float level, I proceeded to run a bunch of acceleration comparisons between the standard PWK and the e-Tube PWK. My prior comparison was confined to 2nd gear, and there was not much difference between the two carbs. This time around, I decided to focus on top gear acceleration comparisons. I also wanted to see if I could detect any of that WOT surge in the standard PWK.
In 2nd gear at WOT, the standard PWK had no hint of surge. The eTube PWK had the 2nd gear surge, and no amount of fiddling would eliminate the surge. It doesn’t seem to hamper acceleration. The two mixers are very close in that department. After about 20 test pulls and numerous adjustments, the standard PWK barely edged out the e-Tube; it was about 0.01 seconds faster from 4K to 7K on the tach. That is easily within any margin of error. My stopwatch finger certainly isn’t responsive enough to call this a legitimate comparison. It’s a draw in 2nd gear.
The top gear tests showed that the standard PWK was clearly the winner. It was a solid 0.27 seconds faster from 3.5K to 5.5K. I did a lot of pulls, there’s no doubt the standard PWK is faster.
Back to top
Knowledge is power.
IP Logged
DragBikeMike
Serious Thumper
Offline
SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!
Posts: 4760
Honolulu
Re: PWK40 Knockoff with E-Tube
Reply #62 -
Yesterday
at 16:49:48
I ran the modified eTube carb for about 2000 miles. It has excellent manners. Starts great, idles perfect, has great response, runs smooth at part throttle, averaged about 53 mpg, and pulls hard at WOT. It’s a great carburetor and worth every penny. Unfortunately, it doesn’t provide better performance than the standard PWK.
The standard PWK did all of the above plus provided better acceleration and averaged 55 mpg. I’m sticking with the standard PWK.
For reference, I am providing the jetting I ended up with on each of the carbs.
Back to top
Jetting_Comparison.jpg
Knowledge is power.
IP Logged
Pages:
1
...
3
4
5
‹
Previous topic
|
Next topic
›
Forum Jump »
» 10 most recent posts
» 10 most recent topics
General Category
»» Rubber Side Down!
- Technical Documents/Reference
- The Marketplace
- The Cafe
- Politics, Religion (Tall Table)
- Forum Upgrade Issues / Tests
« Home
« Home
SuzukiSavage.com
09/26/26 at 01:58:34
›
General Category
›
Rubber Side Down!
› PWK40 Knockoff with E-Tube
SuzukiSavage.com
» Powered by
YaBB 2.2
!
YaBB
© 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved.