If someone blames climate change for deaths in Peru, people compare temperature factors BEFORE the current temperatures being blamed.  They also want to know how many MORE people are dying today, than BEFORE, using two or more numbers to create a percentage.  

 How many MORE people are dying, than BEFORE?

 Could it be agreed it makes no sense to just say "Its climate change!" and ignore all other factors including past temperatures?  After all the POINT is, climate change is bad, does it really matter if any of the claims are true?



 So the latest outbreak of Guillain-Barré Syndrome could be caused by the Covid vaccine.

 The questions here are, Why Peru and not other countries administering the same vaccine?  Bolivia shares no increase in GBS for instance.

 Why now when vaccine administration has been going on for years?

 Why only 96 cases when millions are vaccinated?  96 cases of 27,972,000 is 0.000343200343%.  Peru is at an all time high for vaccination rates, so adjusted for the increase there could be causation, but that number is really, really low.

 How do we explain the previous outbreaks of the same disease in the same country before the vaccine was distributed, or even invented?

 Peru had a similar GBS warning due to large outbreaks in 2019, and multiple previous years going back decades.  The current outbreak has a lower percentage of infection than the previous one in 2019.

 How can we conclusively say Jabs are causing the current GBS out break in Peru given it has happened multiple times pre-vaccine, no other country with the same vaccine has this issue, and the infection rate is lower than before?



https://www.x-mol.net/paper/article/1358621379955302400

https://nn.neurology.org/content/8/2/e952

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7588531/


 Acknowledging more severe GBS outbreaks happened in Peru pre-vaccine does not mean the vaccine is safe and effective, "should" be taken and is "good".  It does mean I refuse to ignore time and space as we know it and will Observe more information than just the type that tells me what I want to be true.  

 The vaccine can still be harmful, and not be causing GBS in Peru.  Just as climate change could be harmful, but doesn't have to be the reason every bad thing happens.

Go ahead,, make that true people just fallill? Ohh,,educate us..


 Peru has had multiple GBS outbreaks in the past, a larger one than this one in 2019.  I am willing to accept that events that happened before a vaccine was created - could not have ever been caused by that vaccine.  I am able to do this because I won't refuse to Observe additional information.

 The information I provided that you won't look at, shows how GBS is contracted there and spread, by refusing to Observe that you can maintain the narrative that I claim people "just fallill".  

 We know why people get GBS, and that it happens in Peru more often.  You, without even looking, and literally saying you don't know anything about it, somehow know its the Jabs.  The only way to maintain this is to refuse to Observe it happened before - would you accept this from Climate Change Alarmists that refuse to Observe historical climate data?  What would you think if they said:

"Go ahead,, make that true that the planet just naturally increases in temperature? Ohh,,educate us.."



 The desire to make every little thing vaccine related is no different than making every everything Climate related.  The vaccine can still be harmful, and not have caused the current GBS outbreak in Peru.  

"Show data supporting GB prior TO ANY VACCINE PROGRAM."

 That's impossible as the syndrome was discovered after vaccines.  However it exists in humans that have never been vaccinated, typically in S America and India.  

 In regions with high amounts of human exposure to Campylobacter jejuni there are high amounts of GBS.  Typically in poor, 3rd world regions, usually in humans that have experienced literally zero modern medical care in their lives, that includes vaccines.  Vaccinations do contribute to GBS, but are not in any way a requirement.  Just as the Covid vaccine in Peru has never been required to get BGS.

 That in itself means any reasonable person would not insist the current issue in Peru must be, and can only be, from Jabs.  A reasonable person would assess that the probability exists, but is not high.  The vaccine can still be harmful without trying to find ways to make this one issue in Peru a vaccine issue.  Just let it be what it is, 96 dead people and maybe 2 or 3 were vaccination accelerated.


 If a vaccine is required for GBS to by in the human body, how do unvaccinated humans get it?  Maybe the same way those kids died from the Covid vaccine in 2018, or the MRI scans from 2019 showed heart inflammation.  

 
 

Wait,,I Don't Care if it happens to the unJabbed.
I don't believe the bullshit.
What do we KNOW
It happens to The Jabbed.
Peru has been JabbinDaFuq outta the people.
Now
A
RARE issue is so common they locked the place down.

Ever see a Country LOCKEF DOWN because of GB?

I'm supposed to deal with you as if you're Not goofy.

But you Actually argued that lockdowns we CAUSING GB.. Exactly backwards from the post.

So,, maybe you should tone down your Authority attitude.
Hell,, bring back TT,

 Over the past day I've been corresponding with humans in Peru.

 Nobody indicates there is a "lockdown" or any travel restrictions, social interaction restrictions.  There is zero evidence of a "lock down" anywhere in the country.  

 Why?

 Because it is not contagious.

 I imagine that part won't be Observed, because if it becomes part of our reality we can't falsely claim the entire country is LOCKED DOWN.  Peru has imposed zero restrictions due to GBS.


 Corinthians soccer players allowed to travel and play because GBS is not spread from human to human:

https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/14/sport/peru-no-guillain-barre-risk-corinthians-...

Known by all sentient beings.
Policy that conflicts with good sense?
I saw what America did.

 Known by anyone that actually Observes the information they will argue as fact.  I don't know how using more lies helps with that conversation.  Pretending Peru is "locked down" will do nothing but further discredit claims the vaccine is unsafe.  How is insisting that lies about Peru are true helping your POINT?


Ever see a Country LOCKEF DOWN because of GB?  

 No, and either have you.


 There is no evidence the current GBS in Peru is exclusively vaccine caused, there are too many additional factors.  The question is: Is the vaccine making it worse?

 For humans willing to accept that the vaccine is not responsible for every death in the world, we can have the conversation about what percentage of impact the vaccine actually has.  We wont ignore, or refuse to Observe the 2019 outbreak pre-vaccine for instance.

 For people that already decided, won't Observe, look at, or accept any additional information, they are stuck arguing about something everyone else can see is false, and are upset about events that never happened.

 Why aren't you upset with the lying website told you Peru is locked down and omitted that GBS outbreaks happened before?  But are upset with the guy that read the information for you and tried to tell you what it says?

"... people that already decided,
won't Observe,
look at,
or accept
any additional information,
they are stuck arguing about
something everyone else can see is false ..."

Sounds Just Like the FDS UL, DFI, WOKE Socialists !

       When they say in union;
'Ban That Model of Gun and all like it,
because it will stop school shootings.'

(Does not sound like a person that, 'thinks'.
Sounds like a person who is TOLD what to think)

So, what Does CAUSE the RARE issue of GB? Where did you get your proof? I remember how authoratative you were that Nooobody was inflating the Death FROM Covid numbers, and CERTAINLY the CDC were not involved..

Buuut,, that was bullshit.
So, you can take a flying leap.

I
Simply
Don't
Care
What you say. Ever. You can declare the sky is blue.
I'm Gonna SEE it, for myself,